Abstract
Self-reported data from a survey of roughly 1,100 female health maintenance organization
enrollees in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area are used to investigate the lifetime
and annual prevalence of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by intimate partners.
The sample consists of a racially balanced and, for the most part, well-educated group
of working women. Three dimensions of abuse based on responses to questions from a
modified version of the Abuse Assessment Screen are employed. In addition to simple
descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed. The estimated annual prevalence
is lower than estimates reported in other studies. However, lifetime prevalence is
very similar to estimates found in primary care clinical samples and somewhat higher
than those derived from population-based surveys. More highly educated women report
the lowest lifetime prevalence of intimate partner abuse. The finding that this sample
of well-educated, middle-class working women has lifetime prevalence rates similar
to those of women who are not as well off demonstrates that intimate partner abuse
is not limited to disadvantaged women from vulnerable population subgroups.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Women's Health IssuesAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies.in: Straus M.A Gelles R.J Physical violence in American families risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick1995
- Fact sheet on gender violence. IWTC/UNIFEM Resource Center, New York1992
- Rates of domestic violence against adult women by men partners.J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989; 2: 227-233
- Prevalence of domestic violence among patients in three ambulatory care internal medicine clinics.J Intern Med. 1991; 6: 317-322
- Prevalence of domestic violence in community practice and rate of physician inquiry.Fam Med. 1992; 24: 283-287
- Domestic violence against women.JAMA. 1995; 273: 1763-1767
- Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated in community hospital emergency departments.JAMA. 1998; 280: 433-438
- The “battering syndrome”.Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123: 737-746
- Violence and abuse.in: Falik M.F Collins K.S Women’s health, The Commonwealth Fund Survey. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD1996
- The health of American women. Louis Harris and Associates, New York1993
- Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States.Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 1702-1704
- Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys.J Marr Fam. 1986; 48: 465-479
Elliot DS, et al. The dynamics of delinquent behavior: a national survey progress report. University of Colorado, Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Sciences, 1985.
- Assessing for abuse during pregnancy.JAMA. 1992; 267: 3176-3178
- The abuse assessment screen.in: Campbell J.C Empowering survivors of abuse health care for battered women and their children. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA1998: 195-203
- Abused wives.J Marr Fam. 1976; 38: 659-668
- Woman-battering. Sage, Newbury Park, CA1981
- An economic analysis of domestic violence.Rev Soc Econ. 1997; 55: 337-358
Bachman R, Saltzman L. Violence against women: estimates from the redesigned survey. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, NCJ-154348:1995.
- Voices of strength and resistance.J Interpers Violence. 1998; 13: 743-762
- Spousal homicide risk and estrangement.Violence Vict. 1993; 8: 3-15
- Femicide in North Carolina.Homicide Stud. 1998; 2: 422-446
- Battered wife syndrome.South Dakota Journal of Medicine. 1990; 43: 19-25
- Characteristics of male spouse abusers consistent with personality disorders.Hosp Commun Psychol. 1988; 39: 763-770
- Anger, hostility, and depression in domestically violent versus generally assaultive men and nonviolent control subjects.J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56: 17-23
- Resources, power, and husband-wife violence.in: Hotaling G.T Straus M.A Social causes of husband–wife violence. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN1980
- Status relationships in marriage.J Marr Fam. 1981; 43: 675-692
- Sanctions & sanctuary. Westview Press, Boulder, CO1992
- The dynamics of domestic violence.Am Econ Rev. 1995; 85: 414-418
- Domestic violence.Int Econ. 1991; 32: 491-511
- A reexamination of the effects of race and social class on the incidence of marital violence.J Marr Fam. 1987; 49: 603
- Wife abuse.J Womens Health. 1992; 1: 77-80
- Behind closed doors. Anchor/Doubleday, Garden City, NJ1980
- Ending the violence. Sage, Newbury Park, CA1997
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
