Advertisement
Editor's Choice| Volume 32, ISSUE 6, P540-549, November 2022

Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Risk at the Intersection of Rurality, Race and Ethnicity, and Medicaid

  • Julia D. Interrante
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to: Julia D. Interrante, MPH, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, 420 Delaware St. SE MMC 729, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Phone: (612) 624-6151; fax: (612) 624-2196.
    Affiliations
    University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mariana S. Tuttle
    Affiliations
    University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lindsay K. Admon
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Katy B. Kozhimannil
    Affiliations
    University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objective

      We examined differences in rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality (SMMM) among Medicaid-funded compared with privately insured hospital births through specific additive and intersectional risk by rural or urban geography, race and ethnicity, and clinical factors.

      Methods

      We used maternal discharge records from childbirth hospitalizations in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample from 2007 to 2015. We calculated predicted probabilities using weighted multivariable logistic regressions to estimate adjusted rates of SMMM, examining differences in rates by payer, rurality, race and ethnicity, and clinical factors. To assess the presence and extent of additive risk by payer, with other risk factors, on rates of SMMM, we estimated the proportion of the combined effect that was due to the interaction.

      Results

      In this analysis of 6,357,796 hospitalizations for childbirth, 2,932,234 were Medicaid funded and 3,425,562 were privately insured. Controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors, the highest rate of SMMM (224.9 per 10,000 births) occurred among rural Indigenous Medicaid-funded births. Medicaid-funded births among Black rural and urban residents, and among Hispanic urban residents, also experienced elevated rates and significant additive interaction. Thirty-two percent (Bonferroni-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 19%–45%) of SMMM cases among patients with chronic heart disease were due to payer interaction, and 19% (Bonferroni-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 17%–22%) among those with cesarean birth were due to the interaction.

      Conclusions

      Heightened rates of SMMM among Medicaid-funded births indicate an opportunity for tailored state and federal policy responses to address the particular maternal health challenges faced by Medicaid beneficiaries, including Black, Indigenous, and rural residents.
      In the United States, maternal health is marked by longstanding inequities based on income, geography, and race and ethnicity (
      • Admon L.K.
      • Winkelman T.N.A.
      • Zivin K.
      • Terplan M.
      • Mhyre J.M.
      • Dalton V.K.
      Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2012–2015.
      ;
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Admon L.K.
      Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
      ). Addressing high rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality (SMMM) and maternal health equity are top policy priorities (). Every year in the United States, approximately 700 people die from pregnancy-related causes, and more than 50,000 individuals per year experience severe maternal morbidity (potentially life-threatening complications of childbirth, including blood clots, acute renal failure, shock, cardiac arrest, respiratory distress, amniotic fluid embolism, eclampsia, and anesthesia complications) (
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
      Pregnancy-related deaths.
      ;
      • Creanga A.A.
      • Berg C.J.
      • Ko J.Y.
      • Farr S.L.
      • Tong V.T.
      • Bruce F.C.
      • Callaghan W.M.
      Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: Where are we now?.
      ). The incidence of SMMM increased by 40% between 2007 and 2015 in the United States (
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Admon L.K.
      Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
      ).
      There are known differences in risk of SMMM by rural/urban geography and by race and ethnicity (
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Admon L.K.
      Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
      ;
      • Luke A.A.
      • Huang K.
      • Lindley K.J.
      • Carter E.B.
      • Joynt Maddox K.E.
      Severe maternal morbidity, race, and rurality: Trends using the National Inpatient Sample, 2012–2017.
      ;
      • Petersen E.E.
      • Davis N.L.
      • Goodman D.
      • Cox S.
      • Mayes N.
      • Johnston E.
      • Barfield W.
      Vital signs: Pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017.
      ). Rural individuals giving birth face higher risks for adverse health outcomes, more limited access to healthcare around pregnancy, and higher rates of SMMM (
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Hung P.
      • Prasad S.
      • Casey M.
      • Moscovice I.
      Rural-urban differences in obstetric care, 2002–2010, and implications for the future.
      ;
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Admon L.K.
      Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
      ;
      • Luke A.A.
      • Huang K.
      • Lindley K.J.
      • Carter E.B.
      • Joynt Maddox K.E.
      Severe maternal morbidity, race, and rurality: Trends using the National Inpatient Sample, 2012–2017.
      ). Non-Hispanic Black (Black) and American Indian/Alaska Native (Indigenous) birthing people have nearly three times the risk of mortality and heightened risk of morbidity, compared with those who are non-Hispanic White (White) (
      • Admon L.K.
      • Winkelman T.N.A.
      • Zivin K.
      • Terplan M.
      • Mhyre J.M.
      • Dalton V.K.
      Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2012–2015.
      ;
      • Petersen E.E.
      • Davis N.L.
      • Goodman D.
      • Cox S.
      • Mayes N.
      • Johnston E.
      • Barfield W.
      Vital signs: Pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017.
      ), and some of the highest risks occur among Black and Indigenous people who are rural residents (
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Tofte A.N.
      • Admon L.K.
      Severe maternal morbidity and mortality among indigenous women in the United States.
      ;
      • Luke A.A.
      • Huang K.
      • Lindley K.J.
      • Carter E.B.
      • Joynt Maddox K.E.
      Severe maternal morbidity, race, and rurality: Trends using the National Inpatient Sample, 2012–2017.
      ).
      The same groups at an increased risk for SMMM—Black, Indigenous, and rural residents—are over-represented among individuals with Medicaid-funded births (
      • Foutz J.
      • Artiga S.
      • Garfield R.
      The role of Medicaid in Rural America.
      ;
      • Kaiser Family Foundation
      Profile of Medicare beneficiaries by race and ethnicity: A chartpack.
      ). Pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries are at an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes because they tend to have worse overall health status and a greater prevalence of chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, which may also increase the risk of SMMM (
      • Admon L.K.
      • Winkelman T.N.A.
      • Moniz M.H.
      • Davis M.M.
      • Heisler M.
      • Dalton V.K.
      Disparities in chronic conditions among women hospitalized for delivery in the United States, 2005-2014.
      ;
      • MACPAC
      Access in brief: Pregnant women and Medicaid.
      ). Pregnancy-related Medicaid eligibility varies across states but is tied to income (ranging from a Federal Poverty Level threshold for eligibility of 138% in Idaho and South Dakota to 380% in Iowa); as such, pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries may also face considerable financial constraints compared with privately insured pregnant people (
      • Kaiser Family Foundation
      Medicaid and CHIP income eligibility limits for pregnant women as a percent of the federal poverty level.
      ). Socioeconomic status, structural factors such as urbanism and racism, and other social determinants of health also influence maternal health inequities (
      • Bailey Z.D.
      • Krieger N.
      • Agénor M.
      • Graves J.
      • Linos N.
      • Bassett M.T.
      Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.
      ;
      • Gadson A.
      • Akpovi E.
      • Mehta P.K.
      Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome.
      ;
      • Probst J.
      • Eberth J.M.
      • Crouch E.
      Structural urbanism contributes to poorer health outcomes for rural America.
      ). In 2020, 42% of U.S. births were funded by Medicaid (
      • Kaiser Family Foundation
      Births financed by Medicaid.
      ).
      Findings from a handful of studies indicate that Medicaid beneficiaries may also be at increased risk for SMMM (
      • Brown C.C.
      • Adams C.E.
      • Moore J.E.
      Race, Medicaid coverage, and equity in maternal morbidity.
      ;
      • Creanga A.A.
      • Berg C.J.
      • Ko J.Y.
      • Farr S.L.
      • Tong V.T.
      • Bruce F.C.
      • Callaghan W.M.
      Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: Where are we now?.
      ;
      • Fingar K.R.
      • Hambrick M.M.
      • Heslin K.C.
      • Moore J.E.
      Trends and disparities in delivery hospitalizations involving severe maternal morbidity, 2006-2015: Statistical brief #243, 2006, 2006–2015.
      ). However, these studies have limitations, including some not controlling for confounding, not statistically comparing risk factors by payer, and not examining intersectional effects on risks. Building on prior studies, we examined differences in risk of SMMM for Medicaid-funded compared with privately insured hospital births among U.S. residents through specific additive and intersectional risk by rural or urban geography, race and ethnicity, and clinical factors to better understand the interplay between Medicaid and other correlated sociodemographic and clinical factors that may contribute to SMMM.

      Methods

      We obtained hospital discharge data for childbirth hospitalizations between 2007 and 2015 from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), a nationally representative sample of all-payer inpatient claims collected by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (
      Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
      HCUP NIS database documentation.
      ). Maternal records from childbirth hospitalizations were identified using standard methods (
      • Kuklina E.V.
      • Whiteman M.K.
      • Hillis S.D.
      • Jamieson D.J.
      • Meikle S.F.
      • Posner S.F.
      • Marchbanks P.A.
      An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: Implications for estimating maternal morbidity.
      ). This multiyear, cross-sectional study of de-identified data was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Minnesota.
      The primary outcome variable was a composite measure of SMMM during the childbirth hospitalization, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and coded using a standard algorithm provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (
      • Admon L.K.
      • Winkelman T.N.A.
      • Zivin K.
      • Terplan M.
      • Mhyre J.M.
      • Dalton V.K.
      Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2012–2015.
      ;
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
      Severe maternal morbidity in the United States.
      ). We also examined a dichotomized, mutually exclusive measure of SMMM in supplemental analyses: 1) SMMM excluding cases in which blood transfusion was the only indicator of SMMM and 2) SMMM in which blood transfusion was the only indicator of SMMM. SMMM without blood transfusion is sometimes used as a stand-alone measure of SMMM given the relative frequency of blood transfusion compared with the other individual indicators of SMMM and the limitations of administrative data for measuring blood transfusion (
      • Himes K.P.
      • Bodnar L.M.
      Validation of criteria to identify severe maternal morbidity.
      ;
      • Main E.K.
      • Abreo A.
      • McNulty J.
      • Gilbert W.
      • McNally C.
      • Poeltler D.
      • Kilpatrick S.
      Measuring severe maternal morbidity: Validation of potential measures.
      ).
      The main predictor was primary payer (i.e., insurance payer for the childbirth hospitalization), categorized as Medicaid (both fee-for-service and managed care) or private insurance. These are the most common primary payers of childbirth hospitalizations, and, as such, were the focus of comparison for this analysis. Only 5.5% of records indicated no insurance, and 0.7% had Medicare and were excluded from this analysis (Appendix Figure A). The main sociodemographic variables of interest were rural/urban maternal residence and maternal race and ethnicity. Metropolitan (urban—population centers of ≥50,000) or either micropolitan or noncore (rural—population centers of <50,000 or no population center) residency was determined at the county level, based on the Office of Management and Budget's standard definition of Metropolitan Statistical Areas and provided in the NIS (
      Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
      HCUP NIS database documentation.
      ). Records with missing data on rural or urban residency (1.3%) were excluded from the analyses. Race and ethnicity were examined as indicators of maternal health risks driven by racism, encompassing the social, environmental, and structural factors that result in outcomes that differ by race and by ethnicity (
      • Boyd R.W.
      • Lindo E.G.
      • Weeks L.D.
      • McLemore M.R.
      On racism: A new standard for publishing on racial health inequities.
      ). Race and ethnicity, as classified by HCUP (
      Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
      HCUP NIS database documentation.
      ), was reported as one of six categories (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Indigenous, and other or unknown). Patients with missing data on race and ethnicity (17% of records in this analysis) were included in the other or unknown category; such missing data are a known challenge with using information from the NIS and are considered not missing at random (
      Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
      Race and ethnicity data improvement toolkit.
      ).
      Patient clinical conditions were selected a priori based on known associations and correlates with SMMM. These were coded as binary indicator variables—cesarean birth, chronic respiratory disease, chronic hypertension, diabetes (preexisting or gestational), chronic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, pulmonary hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, HIV/AIDS, substance use disorder, and depression—and were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes defined in prior work (
      • Admon L.K.
      • Winkelman T.N.A.
      • Moniz M.H.
      • Davis M.M.
      • Heisler M.
      • Dalton V.K.
      Disparities in chronic conditions among women hospitalized for delivery in the United States, 2005-2014.
      ;
      • Bansil P.
      • Kuklina E.V.
      • Meikle S.F.
      • Posner S.F.
      • Kourtis A.P.
      • Ellington S.R.
      • Jamieson D.J.
      Maternal and fetal outcomes among women with depression.
      ;
      • Bateman B.T.
      • Mhyre J.M.
      • Hernandez-Diaz S.
      • Huybrechts K.F.
      • Fischer M.A.
      • Creanga A.A.
      • Gagne J.J.
      Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients.
      ;
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Admon L.K.
      Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
      ).
      Other patient sociodemographic characteristics included age, year of childbirth hospitalization, median income quartile for ZIP code of residence, and hospital region. Patient age was categorized (10–24, 25–29, 30–34, or 35–55 years) to allow for curvilinear associations and year was included as a fixed effect. We added an indicator for patients who lived in a ZIP code where the median income was in the bottom national income quartile. Hospital region was categorized as Northeast, Midwest, South, or West. Patients ages of less than 10 or more than 55 years (outside the range of biological plausibility for childbirth; <0.01%) and those with missing values for patient characteristics (except for race and ethnicity; 3.0%) were excluded for complete case analyses.

      Statistical Analysis

      We conducted a pooled, cross-sectional analysis of maternal discharge records from childbirth hospitalizations. Analyses were weighted using weights provided by HCUP for use with NIS data to allow for national inference, consistent with guidance for the use of these data (
      Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
      Producing national HCUP estimates - Accessible version.
      ). ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes were available for only the first three quarters of 2015; therefore, survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates (
      • Elixhauser A.
      • Heslin K.C.
      • Owens P.
      Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) recommendations for reporting trends using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM/PCS data.
      ). We used weighted frequencies and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to describe the unadjusted prevalence of SMMM, as well as sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for SMMM by primary payer. Unadjusted differences were compared statistically using Rao-Scott χ2 tests for categorical variables and two-sample t tests for continuous variables.
      We calculated predicted probabilities using weighted multivariable logistic regression models to generate adjusted predicted rates and adjusted rate differences (aRDs) by payer of SMMM per 10,000 births with Bonferroni-adjusted 95% CIs (aCIs). We included payer interaction terms in models to examine whether sociodemographic characteristics (rurality, race and ethnicity, and the intersection of rurality and race and ethnicity) and clinical risk factors for SMMM differed between Medicaid-funded compared with privately insured births.
      To evaluate the significance of payer interaction with sociodemographic and clinical variables, we assessed the interaction on the additive scale, rather than the multiplicative odds ratio scale, which methodologists have argued is the appropriate way to assess the presence of synergistic effects (
      • Rothman K.J.
      Epidemiology: An introduction.
      ;
      • VanderWeele T.J.
      • Robins J.M.
      The identification of synergism in the sufficient-component-cause framework.
      ). Additive interaction tells us whether the joint effect of two factors (payer and each risk factor) was greater than the sum of its individual effects. That is, we examined whether the two factors interacted to increase the risk of SMMM above and beyond what would be found if the individual risks were simply added together. We tested for additive interaction by calculating the attributable proportion of SMMM risk owing to interaction (AP; the proportion of the combined effect that is due to the interaction), the relative excess risk owing to interaction (RERI; the part of the total effect that is due to the interaction), and the synergy index (S; the excess risk from having both factors when interaction exists relative to the risk when interaction does not exist) (
      • Andersson T.
      • Alfredsson L.
      • Källberg H.
      • Zdravkovic S.
      • Ahlbom A.
      Calculating measures of biological interaction.
      ), with aCIs and p values for each measure calculated using the delta method (
      • Hosmer D.W.
      • Lemeshow S.
      Confidence interval estimation of interaction.
      ). An AP and RERI of zero and an S of one suggest no additive interaction.
      In supplemental analyses, we calculated adjusted odds ratios with aCIs using the models described elsewhere in this article for our composite and our dichotomized SMMM measures (also described elsewhere in this article) to compare our results with prior studies. We present additive interaction p values in these supplemental analyses to summarize the additive interaction effects across the different measures.
      All models were adjusted for each of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics listed above. To ensure that a 5% type I error rate was maintained for tests of interaction within each model, Bonferroni corrections were used, setting the alpha to 0.05/14 (e.g., 99.6% CIs). All analyses were performed with SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Stata 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

      Results

      The analytic sample included 2,932,234 (unweighted) Medicaid-funded and 3,425,562 (unweighted) privately insured births that occurred in US hospitals between 2007 and 2015 (Appendix Figure A). Medicaid-funded births were more often rural residents (Medicaid, 16.3% [95% CI, 15.5–17.1]; private, 12.5% [95% CI, 11.9–13.1]) and less often White (Medicaid, 33.9% [95% CI, 32.8–35.0]; private insurance, 57.0% [95% CI, 55.6–58.3]) compared with their privately insured counterparts (Table 1). Cesarean birth, diabetes, and chronic heart disease were less common, whereas chronic respiratory disease, HIV/AIDS, and substance use disorder were more common among Medicaid-funded births than those privately insured (p < .001 for all comparisons). At the intersection of rural/urban residence and race and ethnicity, Medicaid was the most common payer for births among Black (76.2%; 95% CI, 74.6–77.8) and Indigenous (74.4%; 95% CI, 69.2–79.6) rural residents, while it was the least common among Asian or Pacific Islander (27.6%; 95% CI, 25.2–30.0) and White (30.2%; 95% CI, 29.3–31.2) urban residents (Appendix Figure B).
      Table 1Unadjusted Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of Medicaid-Funded and Privately Insured Hospital Births, United States 2007–2015 (Unweighted N = 6,357,796)
      Percentages are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. Data are complete case based; therefore, no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data was included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Payer (Medicaid or private) represents the expected primary payer at birth. Medicaid includes fee-for-service and managed care.
      CharacteristicMedicaid Funded Hospital Births (Unweighted n = 2,932,234)Privately Insured Hospital Births (Unweighted n = 3,425,562)p Value
      p values are Rao–Scott χ2 or two-sample t tests.
      Weighted Percent (95% CI)Weighted Percent (95% CI)
      SMMM Measures
       Composite SMMM1.6 (1.6–1.6)1.1 (1.1–1.1)<.001
       SMMM excluding blood transfusion0.5 (0.4–0.5)0.4 (0.4–0.4)<.001
       Blood transfusion only1.1 (1.1–1.2)0.7 (0.7–0.8)<.001
      Residence
      Rural residence is defined as counties with population centers of <50,000 or no population center; urban residence is counties with population centers of ≥50,000.
      <.001
       Urban83.7 (82.9–84.5)87.5 (86.9–88.1)
       Rural16.3 (15.5–17.1)12.5 (11.9–13.1)
      Race and ethnicity<.001
       Non-Hispanic White33.9 (32.8–35.0)57.0 (55.6–58.3)
       Non-Hispanic Black18.1 (17.2–18.9)7.7 (7.2–8.1)
       Hispanic29.0 (27.5–30.5)10.8 (10.2–11.4)
       Asian or Pacific Islander2.9 (2.6–3.2)6.2 (5.7–6.8)
       American Indian/Alaska Native0.9 (0.8–1.1)0.5 (0.4–0.6)
       Unknown/other15.2 (14.0–16.4)17.9 (16.3–19.4)
      Age (weighted mean [SD])25.6 [0.06]29.8 [0.05]<.001
       10–2448.7 (48.3–49.1)17.4 (16.9–17.8)<.001
       25–2927.0 (26.9–27.1)29.3 (29.0–29.6)
       30–3415.7 (15.5–15.9)33.0 (32.7–33.3)
       ≥358.6 (8.4–8.7)20.3 (19.9–20.8)
      Year<.001
       200712.0 (10.6–13.3)12.2 (10.8–13.7)
       200810.8 (9.6–12.1)12.0 (10.6–13.3)
       200911.4 (10.2–12.7)11.0 (9.8–12.3)
       201011.1 (9.9–12.2)10.2 (9.0–11.3)
       201110.6 (9.3–11.9)10.4 (9.2–11.6)
       201211.1 (10.4–11.9)10.8 (10–11.5)
       201310.9 (10.2–11.6)10.9 (10.1–11.6)
       201411.0 (10.3–11.7)11.2 (10.4–11.9)
       2015
      In 2015, ICD-9-CM diagnoses codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data.
      11.0 (10.4–11.7)11.4 (10.6–12.1)
      Income: bottom quartile
      Quartiles of the estimated median household income of residents within the patient's ZIP code within each year.
      40.5 (39.3–41.7)16.6 (15.9–17.3)<.001
      Hospital region<.001
       Northeast12.6 (11.6–13.6)16.8 (15.4–18.2)
       Midwest18.9 (17.8–20.1)24.6 (22.9–26.3)
       South43.7 (41.8–45.5)33.6 (31.6–35.6)
       West24.8 (23.1–26.5)25.0 (23.2–26.8)
      Cesarean birth31.6 (31.3–31.9)34.6 (34.2–34.9).011
      Substance use disorder2.8 (2.7–2.9)0.5 (0.4–0.5)<.001
      Depression2.2 (2.1–2.3)2.1 (2.0–2.1).096
      HIV or AIDS0.1 (0.1–0.2)0.04 (0.04–0.05)<.001
      Pulmonary hypertension0.03 (0.02–0.03)0.01 (0.01–0.02)<.001
      Systemic lupus erythematosus0.1 (0.09–0.1)0.1 (0.1–0.1)<.001
      Chronic kidney disease0.3 (0.3–0.3)0.2 (0.2–0.3)<.001
      Chronic heart disease0.3 (0.3–0.3)0.5 (0.5–0.5)<.001
      Diabetes
      Diabetes includes both preexisting and gestational diabetes mellitus.
      6.9 (6.8–7.0)7.5 (7.3–7.6)<.001
      Chronic hypertension2.1 (2.0–2.2)2.2 (2.1–2.2)<.001
      Chronic respiratory disease3.9 (3.8–4.1)3.3 (3.2–3.4)<.001
      Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; SMMM, severe maternal morbidity and mortality.
      Percentages are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. Data are complete case based; therefore, no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data was included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Payer (Medicaid or private) represents the expected primary payer at birth. Medicaid includes fee-for-service and managed care.
      p values are Rao–Scott χ2 or two-sample t tests.
      Rural residence is defined as counties with population centers of <50,000 or no population center; urban residence is counties with population centers of ≥50,000.
      § In 2015, ICD-9-CM diagnoses codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data.
      ǁ Quartiles of the estimated median household income of residents within the patient's ZIP code within each year.
      Diabetes includes both preexisting and gestational diabetes mellitus.
      In unadjusted weighted assessments, composite SMMM occurred more frequently among Medicaid-funded births compared with the privately insured (Medicaid, 1.6% [95% CI, 1.6–1.6]; private, 1.1% [95% CI, 1.1–1.1]), largely owing to higher rates of blood transfusion among Medicaid-funded births (Medicaid, 1.1% [95% CI, 1.1–1.2]; private, 0.7% [95% CI, 0.7–0.8]) (Table 1). These cases of SMMM included 200 maternal deaths during the study period identified among Medicaid-funded births and 140 among those privately insured (data not shown). Across all 24 categories of Medicaid/private insurance by rural/urban residence by race and ethnicity, four of the top five highest incidences of composite SMMM occurred among births by Black birthing people (privately insured urban, range, 2.0% [95% CI, 1.9–2.0]; Medicaid-funded rural, 2.5% [95% CI, 2.2–2.6]). Rural and urban Medicaid-funded births to people who were Hispanic or Indigenous also had incidences of SMMM among the top 10 highest (Figure 1).
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Unadjusted weighted differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality by race and ethnicity, rural/urban residence, and Medicaid-funded and privately insured hospital births in the United States from 2007 to 2015 (unweighted N = 6,357,796). Data are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data. Data are complete case based; therefore. no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data was included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Rural residence is defined as counties with population centers of less than 50,000 or no population center; urban residence is counties with population centers of 50,000 or more. Medicaid represents the expected primary payer at delivery and includes fee-for-services and managed care. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Number labels on top of bars indicate the groups with the 10 highest incidences of severe morbidity and mortality across categories shown, with #1 showing the highest incidence.
      In adjusted analyses, we found a significantly greater rate of SMMM among Medicaid-funded births compared with those privately insured for both rural and urban residents and for all racial and ethnic groups (Table 2, Appendix Figure C). Urban Medicaid-funded births had an adjusted predicted SMMM rate of 33.1 per 10,000 births (aCI, 29.5–36.6) more than those with private insurance; similarly, rural Medicaid-funded births had an adjusted SMMM rate of 31.7 per 10,000 births (aCI, 25.0–38.3) more than privately insured births. However, there was no evidence of an additive interaction between payer and rural or urban residence. Indigenous Medicaid-funded births experienced an SMMM rate of 47.9 per 10,000 births (aCI, 21.6–74.2) more than their privately insured counterparts, and Black Medicaid-funded births faced SMMM of 39.7 per 10,000 births (aCI, 31.9–47.5) more than their privately insured counterparts. Comparatively, White Medicaid-funded births had an SMMM rate of 23.9 per 10,000 births (aCI, 20.6–27.2) more than White privately insured births, the lowest racial and ethnic difference in rates between Medicaid and privately insured births. Only births among Black and Hispanic birthing people experienced significant additive interaction between payer and race and ethnicity, both with APs of 0.09. This means that, in each group, 9% (aCI, 3%–14% and 2%–16%, respectively) of SMMM cases among births that were both Medicaid funded and either Black or Hispanic were due to the interaction of the two factors.
      Table 2Weighted Adjusted Predicted Rate of SMMM and Additive Interaction of Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics With Medicaid-Funded and Privately Insured Hospital Births, United States 2007–2015
      Data are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnosis codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data. Data are complete case based; therefore, no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data was included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Each model (one for each SMMM measure) adjusts for maternal race and ethnicity, maternal residence (rural/urban), maternal age, childbirth year, bottom quartile of income (quartiles of the estimated median household income of residents within the patient's ZIP code within each year), hospital region, cesarean birth, substance use disorder, depression, HIV or AIDS, pulmonary hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart disease, diabetes (preexisting or gestational), chronic hypertension, and chronic respiratory disease.
      CharacteristicMedicaid-Funded
      Medicaid represents the expected primary payer at birth and includes fee-for-services and managed care.
      Hospital Births
      Privately Insured Hospital BirthsAdjusted Predicted Difference in Rates per 10,000 (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Attributable Proportion (Proportion of Effect owing to Additive Interaction) (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Adjusted Predicted Rate per 10,000 (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Adjusted Predicted Rate per 10,000 (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Residence
      Rural residence is defined as counties with population centers of <50,000 or no population center.
       Urban149.4 (145.5–153.4)116.4 (113.5–119.3)33.1 (29.5–36.6)Reference
       Rural160.9 (154.6–167.2)129.3 (124.1–134.4)31.7 (25.0–38.3)0.00 (−0.07 to 0.07)
      Race and ethnicity
       Non-Hispanic White121.8 (118.2–125.3)97.9 (95.3–100.4)23.9 (20.6–27.2)Reference
       Non-Hispanic Black211.4 (203.7–219.0)171.7 (164.9–178.5)39.7 (31.9–47.5)0.09 (0.03–0.14)
       Hispanic167.5 (160.4–174.6)130.4 (124.6–136.2)37.1 (29.2–45.0)0.09 (0.02–0.16)
       Asian or Pacific Islander165.2 (151.8–178.7)133.5 (124.9–142.0)31.8 (17.9–45.7)0.05 (−0.07 to 0.18)
       American Indian/Alaska Native196.3 (172.6–219.9)148.4 (124.6–172.1)47.9 (21.6–74.2)0.12 (−0.07 to 0.31)
       Unknown or other159.0 (149.6–168.5)110.5 (104.6–116.4)48.5 (39.8–57.2)0.16 (0.08–0.24)
      Clinical characteristics
       Cesarean birth284.7 (277.6–291.8)216.5 (211.0–221.9)68.2 (61.5–74.9)0.19 (0.17–0.22)
       Substance use disorder231.7 (220.3–243.1)208.7 (184.9–232.5)23.0 (−2.4 to 48.3)−0.06 (−0.23 to 0.11)
       Depression187.4 (176.7–198.0)166.6 (156.0–177.2)20.8 (6.4–35.1)−0.08 (−0.19 to 0.04)
       HIV or AIDS229.0 (193.9–264.1)185.2 (125.7–244.8)43.7 (−25.3 to 112.8)0.05 (−0.41 to 0.51)
       Pulmonary hypertension898.5 (733.4–1063.7)975.0 (774.5–1175.6)−76.5 (−328.5 to 175.5)0.03 (−0.39 to 0.46)
       Systemic lupus erythematosus335.6 (281.3–389.9)243.7 (204.4–283.1)91.8 (24.6–159.0)0.19 (−0.09 to 0.46)
       Chronic kidney disease715.2 (665.4–764.9)606.2 (557.5–654.8)109.0 (41.4–176.6)0.14 (0.00–0.28)
       Chronic heart disease439.8 (396.4–483.1)267.0 (242.0–292.0)172.8 (124.0–221.6)0.32 (0.19–0.45)
       Diabetes
      Diabetes includes both preexisting and gestational diabetes mellitus.
      149.6 (144.0–155.2)127.1 (122.0–132.2)22.5 (15.8–29.2)−0.06 (−0.13 to 0.01)
       Chronic hypertension249.6 (238.6–260.7)182.5 (173.1–191.9)67.1 (53.9–80.3)0.13 (0.06–0.21)
       Chronic respiratory disease183.5 (175.3–191.8)154.2 (146.6–161.9)29.3 (18.9–39.7)−0.03 (−0.11 to 0.06)
      Abbreviations: aCI, Bonferroni-adjusted confidence interval; SMMM, severe maternal morbidity and mortality.
      Data are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnosis codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data. Data are complete case based; therefore, no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data was included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Each model (one for each SMMM measure) adjusts for maternal race and ethnicity, maternal residence (rural/urban), maternal age, childbirth year, bottom quartile of income (quartiles of the estimated median household income of residents within the patient's ZIP code within each year), hospital region, cesarean birth, substance use disorder, depression, HIV or AIDS, pulmonary hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart disease, diabetes (preexisting or gestational), chronic hypertension, and chronic respiratory disease.
      Medicaid represents the expected primary payer at birth and includes fee-for-services and managed care.
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      § Rural residence is defined as counties with population centers of <50,000 or no population center.
      ǁ Diabetes includes both preexisting and gestational diabetes mellitus.
      We found wide-ranging differences in rates of SMMM between Medicaid-funded and privately insured births based on clinical characteristics. Having chronic kidney disease or chronic heart disease each had an adjusted predicted SMMM rate of more than 100 per 10,000 births more for Medicaid-funded births than those with private insurance, and those with systemic lupus erythematosus, cesarean birth, and chronic hypertension also had elevated differences in rates. The most significant additive interaction was found with chronic heart disease and cesarean birth, with 32% (aCI, 19%–45%) of SMMM cases among births who were both Medicaid funded and had chronic heart disease owing to the interaction and 19% (aCI, 17%–22%) among births who were both Medicaid funded and had cesarean birth owing to the interaction.
      We examined SMMM differences between Medicaid-funded births and those privately insured at the intersection of rurality and race and ethnicity (Table 3). Rural Indigenous Medicaid-funded births had the highest adjusted predicted rate of SMMM (224.9 per 10,000 births; aCI, 187.0–262.9), followed by urban Black (210.9 per 10,000 births; aCI, 202.8–219.0) and rural Black Medicaid-funded births (207.9 per 10,000 births; aCI, 191.8–223.9). Among rural residents, births by Indigenous people had the greatest differences in rates between Medicaid-funded and privately insured births (aRD, 97.8; aCI, 50.4–145.3), and among urban residents, the greatest difference based on payer (Medicaid vs. private insurance) was among Black births (aRD, 41.2; aCI, 33.0–49.3). Unlike the previous model, where rural residency alone showed no additive interaction with payer, when examining the intersection of rurality and race and ethnicity, births among Indigenous rural residents had significant additive interaction, with 40% (aCI, 11%–69%) of SMMM cases in that population owing to the interaction. The significant additive interaction found among Black and Hispanic births in the previous model was largely among urban, rather than rural, residents, with 16% (aCI, 10%–21%) and 19% (aCI, 11%–26%), respectively, owing to the interaction. As an example in interpreting these findings in terms of cases of SMMM, these results suggest that, if the excess risk of SMMM associated with Medicaid could be mitigated (i.e., if the risk of SMMM among Medicaid-funded births could be decreased to the risk among the privately insured), this would not only prevent the 23 cases per 10,000 births that occur among White urban residents, but an additional 98 cases per 10,000 births among Indigenous rural residents, 41 cases per 10,000 births among Black urban residents, and 38 cases per 10,000 births among Hispanic urban residents that would have occurred because of the interaction of these factors (Figure 2). Additional measures of additive interaction (RERI, S) for the models are shown in Appendix Tables A and B.
      Table 3Weighted-Adjusted Predicted Rate of SMMM and Additive Interaction of the Intersection of Rural/Urban Residence and Race and Ethnicity With Medicaid-Funded and Privately Insured Hospital Births, United States 2007–2015
      Data are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data. Data are complete case-based, therefore no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data was included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Each model (one for each SMMM measure) adjusts for maternal race and ethnicity, maternal residence (rural/urban), maternal age, childbirth year, bottom quartile of income (quartiles of the estimated median household income of residents within the patient's ZIP code within each year), hospital region, cesarean birth, substance use disorder, depression, HIV or AIDS, pulmonary hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart disease, diabetes (preexisting or gestational), chronic hypertension, and chronic respiratory disease.
      CharacteristicMedicaid-Funded
      Medicaid represents the expected primary payer at birth and includes fee-for-services and managed care.
      Hospital Births
      Privately Insured Hospital BirthsAdjusted Predicted Difference in Rates per 10,000 (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Attributable Proportion (Proportion of Effect owing to Additive Interaction) (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Adjusted Predicted Rate per 10,000 (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Adjusted Predicted Rate per 10,000 (aCI
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      )
      Rural residents
      Rural residence is defined as counties with population centers of <50,000 or no population center.
       Non-Hispanic White132.3 (126.2–138.5)106.1 (101.3–110.8)26.3 (19.7–32.8)0.13 (0.05–0.21)
       Non-Hispanic Black207.9 (191.8–223.9)175.6 (152.2–198.9)32.3 (7.4–57.2)0.13 (−0.05 to 0.31)
       Hispanic189.3 (173.5–205.1)168.6 (145.0–192.3)20.6 (−4.8 to 46.1)0.07 (−0.14 to 0.27)
       Asian or Pacific Islander193.9 (143.6–244.2)128.5 (92.3–164.8)65.3 (9.4–121.3)0.30 (−0.06 to 0.66)
       American Indian/Alaska Native224.9 (187.0–262.9)127.1 (82.1–172.1)97.8 (50.4–145.3)0.40 (0.11–0.69)
       Unknown or other161.8 (147.8–175.7)122.7 (112.5–132.9)39.0 (24.6–53.4)0.19 (0.06–0.31)
      Urban residents
       Non-Hispanic White119.4 (115.5–123.2)96.5 (93.7–99.3)22.9 (19.2–26.6)Reference
       Non-Hispanic Black210.9 (202.8–219.0)169.8 (162.8–176.7)41.2 (33.0–49.3)0.16 (0.10–0.21)
       Hispanic164.9 (157.3–172.5)126.7 (120.8–132.6)38.2 (30.0–46.4)0.19 (0.11–0.26)
       Asian or Pacific Islander162.1 (148.4–175.8)131.7 (123.1–140.4)30.4 (16.2–44.5)0.14 (0.02–0.26)
       American Indian/Alaska Native180.2 (151.7–208.7)158.1 (132.0–184.3)22.1 (−9.3 to 53.4)0.06 (−0.20 to 0.32)
       Unknown or other159.2 (148.3–170.2)108.4 (102.0–114.8)50.8 (40.9–60.7)0.27 (0.18–0.35)
      Abbreviations: aCI, Bonferroni-adjusted confidence interval; SMMM, severe maternal morbidity and mortality.
      Data are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data. Data are complete case-based, therefore no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data was included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Each model (one for each SMMM measure) adjusts for maternal race and ethnicity, maternal residence (rural/urban), maternal age, childbirth year, bottom quartile of income (quartiles of the estimated median household income of residents within the patient's ZIP code within each year), hospital region, cesarean birth, substance use disorder, depression, HIV or AIDS, pulmonary hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart disease, diabetes (preexisting or gestational), chronic hypertension, and chronic respiratory disease.
      Medicaid represents the expected primary payer at birth and includes fee-for-services and managed care.
      All 95% CIs are Bonferroni adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (e.g., 99.6% CIs).
      § Rural residence is defined as counties with population centers of <50,000 or no population center.
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Highlighted additive interaction effects of the intersection of rural/urban residence and race and ethnicity with Medicaid-funded hospital births in the United States from 2007 to 2015. Data are weighted to represent the childbearing U.S. population. In 2015, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes were available only for the first three quarters, and survey weights were adjusted in 2015 to generate annualized estimates from these data. Data are complete case based; therefore, no missing data are represented (except for race and ethnicity where missing data were included in the unknown/other category to control for large numbers of missing data from many states in earlier years). Risks were adjusted for maternal race and ethnicity, maternal residence (rural/urban), maternal age, childbirth year, bottom quartile of income (quartiles of the estimated median household income of residents within the patient's ZIP code within each year), hospital region, cesarean birth, substance use disorder, depression, HIV or AIDS, pulmonary hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart disease, diabetes (preexisting or gestational), chronic hypertension, and chronic respiratory disease. Medicaid represents the expected primary payer at delivery and includes fee-for-services and managed care. Abbreviation: SMMM, severe maternal morbidity and mortality.

      Discussion

      Overall, people with Medicaid at the time of childbirth have moderately increased rates of SMMM during childbirth hospitalization compared with those insured by private insurance (as shown in unadjusted weighted results). However, this examination of the adjusted rates of SMMM associated with rural residency and likely experiences of racism, as well as primary payer, reveal important differences. Medicaid-funded births among Indigenous rural residents experience dramatically higher rates of SMMM, compared with other groups. Medicaid-funded births among Black residents of both rural and urban areas, and Medicaid-funded births among Hispanic urban residents, also experience higher rates. This finding indicates that known racial and geographic disparities are not decreased when accounting for Medicaid coverage; moreover, there is substantive interaction between these factors and Medicaid coverage.
      This study builds on prior findings using hospital discharge data to examine racial, geographic, or payer-based disparities in SMMM (
      • Brown C.C.
      • Adams C.E.
      • Moore J.E.
      Race, Medicaid coverage, and equity in maternal morbidity.
      ;
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Admon L.K.
      Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
      ;
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Tofte A.N.
      • Admon L.K.
      Severe maternal morbidity and mortality among indigenous women in the United States.
      ;
      • Luke A.A.
      • Huang K.
      • Lindley K.J.
      • Carter E.B.
      • Joynt Maddox K.E.
      Severe maternal morbidity, race, and rurality: Trends using the National Inpatient Sample, 2012–2017.
      ). These studies generally found increased odds of SMMM, separately, among Black, Hispanic, Indigenous, and Asian individuals; among rural residents; and among Medicaid-funded births. Although our study confirmed findings that the magnitude of the odds (on the multiplicative scale) for sociodemographic and clinical correlates of SMMM was similar among Medicaid-funded as privately insured births (Appendix Table C), we found that predicted rates (on the additive scale) differed. We found significantly greater rates of SMMM among Medicaid-funded births compared with those privately insured for both rural and urban residents and for all racial and ethnic groups. In contrast with prior studies using multiple stratified models to compare these risk factors between Medicaid and privately insured births (
      • Brown C.C.
      • Adams C.E.
      • Moore J.E.
      Race, Medicaid coverage, and equity in maternal morbidity.
      ), we statistically assessed these differences by including interaction terms within our model. This analysis is the first to measure the specific additive and intersectional risks of geography, race and ethnicity, and poverty; understanding these effects is of practical significance when designing policies and programs to reduce SMMM and make meaningful improvements to maternal health in the United States. This analysis highlights the importance of tailoring policy to particular populations when addressing SMMM (
      • Chen J.
      • Cox S.
      • Kuklina E.V.
      • Ferre C.
      • Barfield W.
      • Li R.
      Assessment of Incidence and factors associated with severe maternal morbidity after delivery discharge among women in the US.
      ).

      Strengths and Limitations

      As a population-based, nationally representative sample of all inpatient hospitalizations, these findings are generalizable to the United States as a whole. However, these analyses are subject to important limitations. First, these findings reflect hospital discharge diagnoses during childbirth hospitalization, meaning that they exclude SMMM that occurred prior to or after childbirth hospitalization. Therefore, our analysis is not inclusive of all maternal morbidity or mortality (
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Interrante J.D.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Admon L.K.
      Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
      ), and, as such, our results necessarily underestimate the overall incidence of SMMM. Despite this limitation, our findings are important; data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that 36% of maternal deaths occur on the day of or within 1 week after childbirth (
      • Petersen E.E.
      • Davis N.L.
      • Goodman D.
      • Cox S.
      • Mayes N.
      • Johnston E.
      • Barfield W.
      Vital signs: Pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017.
      ), and 85% of severe maternal morbidities occur during the childbirth hospitalization (
      • Chen J.
      • Cox S.
      • Kuklina E.V.
      • Ferre C.
      • Barfield W.
      • Li R.
      Assessment of Incidence and factors associated with severe maternal morbidity after delivery discharge among women in the US.
      ). Further, because the unit of analysis is the individual discharge record, repeat pregnancies during the study period could not be determined. If repeat pregnancies among high-risk patients are greater among Medicaid beneficiaries, for example, this could impact study findings. Second, hospital discharge data do not consistently include some potentially important maternal characteristics (e.g., maternal education, nativity, obesity, smoking) that may differ between Medicaid beneficiaries and patients with private insurance. These important confounders could attenuate some of the observed associations. Third, state of birth is not coded separately in these data, so we were not able to produce estimates at the state level, which is a limitation because Medicaid programs differ substantially across states. This limitation is potentially important, given state differences in Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Just more than one-half of all states had expanded Medicaid by 2015 (
      • Kaiser Family Foundation
      Status of state Medicaid expansion decisions: Interactive map.
      ); however, this was only applicable to the last 2 years of the 9 years in the study period. In fact, although we did find differences in the Medicaid population between the two years before and after ACA changes (Appendix Table D), restricting our analyses to only pre-ACA years (2007–2013) did not change the study findings (Appendix Table E). Further, rates of SMMM for both Medicaid-funded and privately insured births increased across the study period in a similar pattern (Appendix Figure D). Broader efforts to improve maternal health, including decreasing early elective deliveries, especially through Medicaid policies, were also implemented during the study period (
      • Allen L.
      • Grossman D.
      The impact of voluntary and nonpayment policies in reducing early-term elective deliveries among privately insured and Medicaid enrollees.
      ;
      • Fowler T.T.
      • Schiff J.
      • Applegate M.S.
      • Griffith K.
      • Fairbrother G.L.
      Early elective deliveries accounted for nearly 9 percent of births paid for by Medicaid.
      ). Although we cannot isolate the specific effects of the myriad efforts to address maternal health over the study period, our results were stable across the various sensitivity analyses mentioned elsewhere in this article. Fourth, some counties may have changed rural versus urban designation during the study period. Finally, hospital variation in coding could bias these results if variability followed payer patterns. Despite these limitations, we believe these data are important for informing tailored clinical and policy efforts for addressing hospital-based SMMM, particularly among Medicaid beneficiaries.

      Implications for Policy and Practice

      In this analysis, insurance status plays multiple roles, as an indicator of socioeconomic status as well as an important policy lever. Medicaid coverage is extraordinarily important for maternal health, and increased access is associated with lower maternal mortality (
      • Eliason E.L.
      Adoption of Medicaid expansion is associated with lower maternal mortality.
      ). Still, this analysis found that SMMM occurred more frequently among Medicaid beneficiaries compared with privately insured people; these risks accrue unevenly based on geography and race and ethnicity, and Medicaid coverage does not mitigate the risks presented by structural racism and by urban bias in healthcare (
      • Crear-Perry J.
      • Correa-de-Araujo R.
      • Lewis Johnson T.
      • McLemore M.R.
      • Neilson E.
      • Wallace M.
      Social and structural determinants of health inequities in maternal health.
      ;
      • Probst J.
      • Eberth J.M.
      • Crouch E.
      Structural urbanism contributes to poorer health outcomes for rural America.
      ). Additionally, Medicaid beneficiaries are disproportionately Black, Indigenous, and rural, and this analysis revealed additive risk, especially for rural Indigenous Medicaid beneficiaries who gave birth. The findings on intersectionality of SMMM risk suggest that Medicaid policy change to improve maternal health must account for the particular challenges posed by rural locations and by racism, and also that policies that lower SMMM risk among Medicaid patients could have additional additive benefits in reducing racial and ethnic and rural versus urban disparities.
      As the primary payer for nearly one-half of all births in the United States, state Medicaid programs have an opportunity to contribute to efforts to improve maternal health and decrease SMMM through reimbursement and coverage policies that address the disproportionate risk of SMMM among Medicaid beneficiaries as a whole, as well as among particular groups of beneficiaries that experience heightened risks based on geography, race and ethnicity, or clinical conditions. Recent efforts to extend postpartum Medicaid coverage beyond 60 days postpartum could build on gains experienced in the fight against maternal mortality, following state Medicaid expansions, by ensuring that patients who experience pregnancy complications like severe maternal morbidity do not experience insurance disruptions that can impact access to needed ongoing care (
      • Eliason E.L.
      Adoption of Medicaid expansion is associated with lower maternal mortality.
      ;
      • Ranji U.
      • Gomez I.
      • Salganicoff A.
      Expanding postpartum Medicaid coverage.
      ). Care bundles to address racial disparities in maternal health have been developed and adopted by healthcare delivery systems (
      • Howell E.A.
      • Brown H.
      • Brumley J.
      • Bryant A.S.
      • Caughey A.B.
      • Cornell A.M.
      • Grobman W.A.
      Reduction of peripartum racial and ethnic disparities: A conceptual framework and maternal safety consensus bundle.
      ), and the uptake of such evidence-based models could be incentivized or encouraged by state Medicaid programs (
      • Howell E.A.
      Reducing disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality.
      ). Additionally, the specific risks faced by rural residents, who have limited and decreasing access to maternity care (
      • Kozhimannil K.B.
      • Hung P.
      • Henning-Smith C.
      • Casey M.M.
      • Prasad S.
      Association between loss of hospital-based obstetric services and birth outcomes in rural counties in the United States.
      ), may be mitigated by Medicaid policies that focus on low-volume payment adjustments as well as coverage for nonclinical services such as transportation, housing, and community-based support (doula care, peer counseling, lactation consultants, etc.). Finally, clinical efforts to decrease SMMM nationally have focused on care bundles to ensure that all clinical risks are addressed (
      • Arora K.S.
      • Shields L.E.
      • Grobman W.A.
      • D’Alton M.E.
      • Lappen J.R.
      • Mercer B.M.
      Triggers, bundles, protocols, and checklists–What every maternal care provider needs to know.
      ;
      • D’Alton M.E.
      • Main E.K.
      • Menard M.K.
      • Levy B.S.
      The National Partnership for Maternal Safety.
      ). Because clinical preexisting comorbidities were among the strongest predictors of all measures of SMMM, the importance of focusing on clinical risk alongside broad efforts to address inequities by payer, race and ethnicity, and geography is clear. Medicaid programs can work with healthcare delivery systems and managed care organizations to ensure equitable uptake of evidence-based practices for beneficiaries with clinical conditions that render them vulnerable to SMMM.

      Conclusions

      Attention to the particular challenges faced by Medicaid patients based on geography and race and ethnicity is crucial to the success of state and national efforts to improve maternal health. This analysis offers new data on the increased incidence of SMMM among Medicaid beneficiaries, in particular, by looking at the specific intersectional and additive risks of geography, race and ethnicity, and poverty. It should inform tailored policy responses to address the particular risks and challenges faced by Medicaid beneficiaries, particularly Black, Indigenous, and rural residents, and those with complex clinical conditions. If policy makers use this information to more finely tune efforts to address SMMM among Medicaid beneficiaries in particular, fewer Black, Indigenous, and rural birthing people may experience life-threatening pregnancy complications or death.

      Supplementary Data

      References

        • Admon L.K.
        • Winkelman T.N.A.
        • Moniz M.H.
        • Davis M.M.
        • Heisler M.
        • Dalton V.K.
        Disparities in chronic conditions among women hospitalized for delivery in the United States, 2005-2014.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 130: 1319-1326
        • Admon L.K.
        • Winkelman T.N.A.
        • Zivin K.
        • Terplan M.
        • Mhyre J.M.
        • Dalton V.K.
        Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2012–2015.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 132: 1158-1166
        • Allen L.
        • Grossman D.
        The impact of voluntary and nonpayment policies in reducing early-term elective deliveries among privately insured and Medicaid enrollees.
        Health Services Research. 2020; 55: 63-70
        • Andersson T.
        • Alfredsson L.
        • Källberg H.
        • Zdravkovic S.
        • Ahlbom A.
        Calculating measures of biological interaction.
        European Journal of Epidemiology. 2005; 20: 575-579
        • Arora K.S.
        • Shields L.E.
        • Grobman W.A.
        • D’Alton M.E.
        • Lappen J.R.
        • Mercer B.M.
        Triggers, bundles, protocols, and checklists–What every maternal care provider needs to know.
        American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016; 214: 444-451
        • Bailey Z.D.
        • Krieger N.
        • Agénor M.
        • Graves J.
        • Linos N.
        • Bassett M.T.
        Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 1453-1463
        • Bansil P.
        • Kuklina E.V.
        • Meikle S.F.
        • Posner S.F.
        • Kourtis A.P.
        • Ellington S.R.
        • Jamieson D.J.
        Maternal and fetal outcomes among women with depression.
        Journal of Women’s Health. 2010; 19: 329-334
        • Bateman B.T.
        • Mhyre J.M.
        • Hernandez-Diaz S.
        • Huybrechts K.F.
        • Fischer M.A.
        • Creanga A.A.
        • Gagne J.J.
        Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013; 122: 957-965
        • Boyd R.W.
        • Lindo E.G.
        • Weeks L.D.
        • McLemore M.R.
        On racism: A new standard for publishing on racial health inequities.
        Health Affairs Blog. 2020; 10: 1
        • Brown C.C.
        • Adams C.E.
        • Moore J.E.
        Race, Medicaid coverage, and equity in maternal morbidity.
        Women’s Health Issues. 2021; 31: 245-253
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Pregnancy-related deaths.
        (Available:)
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Severe maternal morbidity in the United States.
        (Available:)
        • Chen J.
        • Cox S.
        • Kuklina E.V.
        • Ferre C.
        • Barfield W.
        • Li R.
        Assessment of Incidence and factors associated with severe maternal morbidity after delivery discharge among women in the US.
        JAMA Network Open. 2021; 4: e2036148
        • Creanga A.A.
        • Berg C.J.
        • Ko J.Y.
        • Farr S.L.
        • Tong V.T.
        • Bruce F.C.
        • Callaghan W.M.
        Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: Where are we now?.
        Journal of Women’s Health. 2014; 23: 3-9
        • Crear-Perry J.
        • Correa-de-Araujo R.
        • Lewis Johnson T.
        • McLemore M.R.
        • Neilson E.
        • Wallace M.
        Social and structural determinants of health inequities in maternal health.
        Journal of Women’s Health. 2021; 30: 230-235
        • D’Alton M.E.
        • Main E.K.
        • Menard M.K.
        • Levy B.S.
        The National Partnership for Maternal Safety.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014; 123: 973-977
        • Eliason E.L.
        Adoption of Medicaid expansion is associated with lower maternal mortality.
        Women’s Health Issues. 2020; 30: 147-152
        • Elixhauser A.
        • Heslin K.C.
        • Owens P.
        Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) recommendations for reporting trends using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM/PCS data.
        (Available:)
        • Fingar K.R.
        • Hambrick M.M.
        • Heslin K.C.
        • Moore J.E.
        Trends and disparities in delivery hospitalizations involving severe maternal morbidity, 2006-2015: Statistical brief #243, 2006, 2006–2015.
        (Available:)
        https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2018.77301
        Date: 2006
        Date accessed: December 24, 2021
        • Foutz J.
        • Artiga S.
        • Garfield R.
        The role of Medicaid in Rural America.
        (Available:)
        • Fowler T.T.
        • Schiff J.
        • Applegate M.S.
        • Griffith K.
        • Fairbrother G.L.
        Early elective deliveries accounted for nearly 9 percent of births paid for by Medicaid.
        Health Affairs. 2014; 33: 2170-2178
        • Gadson A.
        • Akpovi E.
        • Mehta P.K.
        Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome.
        Seminars in Perinatology. 2017; 41: 308-317
        • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
        Race and ethnicity data improvement toolkit.
        (Available:)
        • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
        Producing national HCUP estimates - Accessible version.
        (Available:)
        • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
        HCUP NIS database documentation.
        (Avaialble:)
        www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp
        Date: 2019
        Date accessed: June 10, 2021
        • Himes K.P.
        • Bodnar L.M.
        Validation of criteria to identify severe maternal morbidity.
        Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2020; 34: 408-415
        • Hosmer D.W.
        • Lemeshow S.
        Confidence interval estimation of interaction.
        Epidemiology. 1992; 3: 452-456
        • Howell E.A.
        Reducing disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality.
        Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018; 61: 387-399
        • Howell E.A.
        • Brown H.
        • Brumley J.
        • Bryant A.S.
        • Caughey A.B.
        • Cornell A.M.
        • Grobman W.A.
        Reduction of peripartum racial and ethnic disparities: A conceptual framework and maternal safety consensus bundle.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 131: 770-782
        • Kaiser Family Foundation
        Profile of Medicare beneficiaries by race and ethnicity: A chartpack.
        (Available:)
        • Kaiser Family Foundation
        Births financed by Medicaid.
        (Available:)
        • Kaiser Family Foundation
        Medicaid and CHIP income eligibility limits for pregnant women as a percent of the federal poverty level.
        (Avaiable:)
        • Kaiser Family Foundation
        Status of state Medicaid expansion decisions: Interactive map.
        (Available:)
        • Kozhimannil K.B.
        • Hung P.
        • Henning-Smith C.
        • Casey M.M.
        • Prasad S.
        Association between loss of hospital-based obstetric services and birth outcomes in rural counties in the United States.
        JAMA. 2018; 319: 1239-1247
        • Kozhimannil K.B.
        • Hung P.
        • Prasad S.
        • Casey M.
        • Moscovice I.
        Rural-urban differences in obstetric care, 2002–2010, and implications for the future.
        Medical Care. 2014; 52: 4-9
        • Kozhimannil K.B.
        • Interrante J.D.
        • Henning-Smith C.
        • Admon L.K.
        Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15.
        Health Affairs. 2019; 38: 2077-2085
        • Kozhimannil K.B.
        • Interrante J.D.
        • Tofte A.N.
        • Admon L.K.
        Severe maternal morbidity and mortality among indigenous women in the United States.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020; 135: 294-300
        • Kuklina E.V.
        • Whiteman M.K.
        • Hillis S.D.
        • Jamieson D.J.
        • Meikle S.F.
        • Posner S.F.
        • Marchbanks P.A.
        An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: Implications for estimating maternal morbidity.
        Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2008; 12: 469-477
        • Luke A.A.
        • Huang K.
        • Lindley K.J.
        • Carter E.B.
        • Joynt Maddox K.E.
        Severe maternal morbidity, race, and rurality: Trends using the National Inpatient Sample, 2012–2017.
        Journal of Women’s Health. 2021; 30: 837-847
        • MACPAC
        Access in brief: Pregnant women and Medicaid.
        (Available:)
        • Main E.K.
        • Abreo A.
        • McNulty J.
        • Gilbert W.
        • McNally C.
        • Poeltler D.
        • Kilpatrick S.
        Measuring severe maternal morbidity: Validation of potential measures.
        American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016; 214: 643e1-643e10
        • Petersen E.E.
        • Davis N.L.
        • Goodman D.
        • Cox S.
        • Mayes N.
        • Johnston E.
        • Barfield W.
        Vital signs: Pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017.
        MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2019; 68: 423-429
        • Probst J.
        • Eberth J.M.
        • Crouch E.
        Structural urbanism contributes to poorer health outcomes for rural America.
        Health Affairs. 2019; 38: 1976-1984
        • Ranji U.
        • Gomez I.
        • Salganicoff A.
        Expanding postpartum Medicaid coverage.
        (Available)
        • Rothman K.J.
        Epidemiology: An introduction.
        Oxford University Press, New York2002
      1. State Policies to Improve Maternal Health Outcomes.
        (Available:)
        • VanderWeele T.J.
        • Robins J.M.
        The identification of synergism in the sufficient-component-cause framework.
        Epidemiology. 2007; 18: 329-339

      Biography

      Julia D. Interrante, MPH, is a doctoral candidate in the Division of Health Policy and Management at the University of Minnesota. Her work examines the impact of health policy on reproductive and maternal health.
      Mariana S. Tuttle, MPH, is a research and communications fellow at the University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center. Her research focuses on rural health across the lifespan, from maternal and child health to aging and older adults.
      Lindsay K. Admon, MD, MSc, is an Assistant Professor and obstetrician-gynecologist at the University of Michigan. Her research addresses disparities in maternal health and the evaluation of strategies to improve maternal and child health outcomes.
      Katy B. Kozhimannil, PhD, MPA, is Distinguished McKnight Professor, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, and Director of the University's Rural Health Research Center. Her research contributes evidence for clinical and policy strategies advancing racial, gender, and geographic equity.