Using Deliberative and Qualitative Methods to Recommend Revisions to the Medicaid Sterilization Waiting Period

      Abstract

      Background

      Sterilization is used by one-quarter of women in the United States for contraception and is a preferred birth control method among women with Medicaid. A history of coercive sterilization practices in the United States led to federal regulation of consent for Medicaid sterilization (including a mandated waiting period); this regulation can be a barrier to sterilization in Medicaid-insured women. This study aimed to develop a revised model of Medicaid sterilization policy grounded in the experiences of women impacted by current regulations.

      Methods

      This prospective study used in-depth interviews with 32 Medicaid-insured women who had obtained or tried to obtain sterilization to elicit recommendations regarding the Medicaid waiting period. Deliberative methods (a planning cell including 20 key community stakeholders) were used to evaluate women's recommendations and propose a revised policy for sterilization under Medicaid.

      Results

      In-depth interview data demonstrated that women were often not made aware of the 30-day waiting period during informed consent before sterilization. Once informed about the policy, women described the Medicaid waiting period as “unfair,” because it did not apply to all women. After deliberating women's recommendations to change the policy, key stakeholders came to a consensus around replacing the current waiting period policy with an improved consent process that would acknowledge the problematic history of coercive sterilization. Participants could not endorse removing the waiting period altogether without evidence that the health system had shifted away from coercive sterilization practices.

      Conclusions

      Using deliberative methods and the recommendations of women with Medicaid insurance, community stakeholders recommended developing a revised Medicaid sterilization consent policy that acknowledged the historical context of this procedure.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Abelson J.
        Using qualitative research methods to inform health policy: The case of public deliberation.
        in: Bourgeault I. Dingwall R. De Vries R. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research. Sage, London2010: 606-620
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
        Committee opinion number 530: Access to postpartum sterilization.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 120: 212-215
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
        Committee Opinion Number 695: Sterilization of women: Ethical issues and considerations.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 129: e109-e116
        • Anderson J.E.
        • Jamieson D.J.
        • Warner L.
        • Kissin D.M.
        • Nangia A.K.
        • Macaluso M.
        Contraceptive sterilization among married adults: National data on who chooses vasectomy and tubal sterilization.
        Contraception. 2012; 85: 552-557
        • Averill J.B.
        Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry.
        Qualitative Health Research. 2002; 12: 855-866
        • Beebe J.
        Rapid assessment process: An introduction.
        AltaMira Press, New York2001
        • Block-Abraham D.
        • Arora K.S.
        • Tate D.
        • Gee R.E.
        Medicaid consent to sterilization forms: Historical, practical, ethical, and advocacy considerations.
        Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 58: 409-417
        • Boardman L.A.
        • DeSimone M.
        • Allen R.H.
        Barriers to completion of desired postpartum sterilization.
        Rhode Island Medical Journal. 2013; 96: 32-34
        • Borrero S.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Bost J.E.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Ibrahim S.A.
        Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007; 109: 94-100
        • Borrero S.
        • Nikolajski C.
        • Rodriguez K.L.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Arnold R.M.
        • Ibrahim S.A.
        "Everything I know I learned from my mother…or not": Perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization.
        Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2009; 24: 312-319
        • Borrero S.
        • Abebe K.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Nikolajski C.
        • Ibrahim S.
        Racial variation in tubal sterilization rates: Role of patient-level factors.
        Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 95: 17-22
        • Borrero S.
        • Zite N.
        • Potter J.E.
        • Trussell J.
        • Smith K.
        Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 691-696
        • Borrero S.
        • Zite N.
        • Potter J.E.
        • Trussell J.
        Medicaid policy on sterilization--anachronistic or still relevant?.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2014; 370: 102-104
        • Bradley E.H.
        • Curry L.A.
        • Devers K.J.
        Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.
        Health Services Research. 2007; 42: 1758-1772
        • Brown B.P.
        • Chor J.
        Adding injury to injury: Ethical implications of the Medicaid sterilization consent regulations.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 123: 1348-1351
        • Carman K.L.
        • Heeringa J.W.
        • Heil S.K.R.
        • Garfinkel S.
        • Windham A.
        • Gilmore D.
        • Pathak-Sen E.
        The use of public deliberation in eliciting public input: Findings from a literature review – Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Publication No. 13-EHC070-EF.
        (Available:)
        • Cheney A.M.
        • Haynes T.F.
        • Olson M.
        • Cottoms N.
        • Bryant K.
        • Reaves C.M.
        • Sullivan G.
        Using deliberative and qualitative methods to mobilize community around the mental health needs of rural African Americans.
        Health Systems and Reform. 2018; 4: 8-18
        • Daniels K.
        • Daugherty J.
        • Jones J.
        • Mosher W.
        Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.
        National Health Statistics Report. 2015; 86: 1-14
        • Darney P.D.
        New kinds of injustice for women?.
        American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 212: 693-694
        • Diekema D.S.
        Involuntary sterilization of persons with mental retardation: An ethical analysis.
        Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Review. 2003; 9: 21-26
        • Foley O.
        • Janiak E.
        • Dutton C.
        Women’s decision making for postpartum sterilization: Does the Medicaid waiting period add value?.
        Contraception. 2018; 98: 312-316
        • Garcia G.
        • Richardson D.M.
        • Gonzales K.L.
        • Cuevas A.G.
        Trends and disparities in postpartum sterilization after cesarean section, 2000 through 2008.
        Women’s Health Issues. 2015; 25: 634-640
        • Gilliam M.
        • Davis S.D.
        • Berlin A.
        • Zite N.B.
        A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requests.
        Contraception. 2008; 77: 44-49
        • Kingston R.J.
        Citizens, deliberation, and the practice of democracy: A triptych from the Kettering Review.
        Kettering Foundation Press, Dayton, OH2012
        • Leyser-Whalen O.
        • Berenson A.B.
        Control and constraint for low-income women choosing outpatient sterilization.
        Qualitative Health Research. 2013; 23: 1114-1124
        • Moaddab A.
        • McCullough L.B.
        • Chervenak F.A.
        • Fox K.A.
        • Aagaard K.M.
        • Salmanian B.
        • Shamshirsaz A.A.
        Health care justice and its implications for current policy of a mandatory waiting period for elective tubal sterilization.
        American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 212: 736-739
        • Natavio M.F.
        • Cortessis V.K.
        • Zite N.B.
        • Cieselski K.
        • Eggers H.
        • Brown N.
        • Segall-Gutierrez P.
        The use of a low-literacy version of the Medicaid sterilization consent form to assess sterilization-related knowledge in Spanish-speaking women: Results from a randomized controlled trial.
        Contraception. 2018; 97: 546-551
        • Participedia
        Planning cells.
        (Available:)
        https://participedia.net/method/160
        Date: 2018
        Date accessed: June 30, 2019
        • Peterson H.B.
        • Xia Z.
        • Hughes J.M.
        • Wilcox L.S.
        • Tylor L.R.
        • Trussell J.
        The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.
        American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996; 174: 1161-1168
        • Rourke B.
        Developing material for deliberative forums.
        (Available:)
        • Rowlands S.
        • Wale J.
        Sterilisations at delivery or after childbirth: Addressing continuing abuses in the consent process.
        Global Public Health. 2019; 14: 1153-1166
        • Ryan G.
        • Bernard H.
        Techniques to identify themes.
        Field Methods. 2003; 15: 85-109
        • Schmidt J.E.
        • Hillis S.D.
        • Marchbanks P.A.
        • Jeng G.
        • Peterson H.B.
        • for the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group
        Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: Findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.
        Fertility and Sterility. 2000; 74: 892-898
        • Seibel-Seamon J.
        • Visintine J.F.
        • Leiby B.E.
        • Weinstein L.
        Factors predictive for failure to perform postpartum tubal ligation following vaginal delivery.
        Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2009; 54: 160-164
        • Siegel J.E.
        • Heeringa J.W.
        • Carman K.L.
        Public deliberation in decisions about health research.
        American Medical Association Journal of Ethics. 2013; 15: 56-64
        • Sullivan G.
        • Cheney A.
        • Olson M.
        • Haynes T.
        • Bryant K.
        • Cottoms N.
        • Reaves C.
        • Curran G.
        Rural African Americans’ perspectives on mental health: Comparing focus groups and deliberative democracy forums.
        Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2017; 28: 548-565
        • Thurman A.R.
        • Janecek T.
        One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 116: 1071-1077
        • Westhoff C.
        • Davis A.
        Tubal sterilization: Focus on the U.S. experience.
        Fertility and Sterility. 2000; 73: 913-922
        • White K.
        • Potter J.E.
        Reconsidering racial/ethnic differences in sterilization in the United States.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 550-556
        • Zite N.
        • Wuellner S.
        • Gilliam M.
        Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization.
        Contraception. 2006; 73: 404-407
        • Zite N.B.
        • Wallace L.S.
        Use of a low-literacy informed consent form to improve women's understanding of tubal sterilization: A randomized controlled trial.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011; 117: 1160-1166
        • Zuchowski J.L.
        • Chrystal J.G.
        • Hamilton A.B.
        • Patton E.W.
        • Zephyrin L.C.
        • Yano E.M.
        • Cordasco K.M.
        Coordinating care across health care systems for veterans with gynecologic malignancies: A qualitative analysis.
        Medical Care. 2017; 55: S53-S60

      Biography

      Priya Batra, MD, MS, FACOG, is a health services researcher and practicing women's health clinician. Her work highlights how the implementation of health policies and health care delivery practices affect U.S. disparities in reproductive health access and maternal health outcomes.

      Biography

      Katheryn Rodriguez, BA, is a research coordinator at the University of California, Riverside. Her current projects aim to integrate anthropological insights into clinical practice and health policy through interdisciplinary collaboration. Her work centers on social inequalities and health disparities.

      Biography

      Ann M. Cheney, PhD, is faculty in the Department of Social Medicine, Population, and Public Health at the University of California, Riverside School of Medicine. Her work focuses on structural inequalities in health among immigrants, women, and rural populations.