Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
- Did contraceptive use patterns change after the Affordable Care Act? A descriptive analysis.Women’s Health Issues. 2017; 27: 316-321
- The impact of insurance coverage on utilization of prescription contraceptives: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2018; 37: 571-601
- Did increasing use of highly effective contraception contribute to declining abortions in Iowa?.Contraception. 2015; 91: 167-173
- The relationship between long-acting reversible contraception and insurance coverage: A retrospective analysis.Contraception. 2016; 93: 266-272
- Affordable Care Act’s mandate eliminating contraceptive cost sharing influenced choices of women with employer coverage.Health Affairs. 2016; 35: 1608-1615
- Using a reproductive life planning website and action plan to help women choose and use birth control.Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 2018 (Available:)www.pcori.org/research-results/2013/using-reproductive-life-planning-website-and-action-plan-help-women-choose-andDate accessed: November 14, 2018
- Reducing unintended pregnancies through web-based reproductive life planning and contraceptive action planning among privately insured women: Study protocol for the MyNewOptions randomized, controlled trial.Women’s Health Issues. 2015; 25: 641-648
- Increasing access to contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.(Available:)www.cdc.govDate: 2015Date accessed: November 14, 2018
- Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.2011 (Available:)www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr086.pdfDate accessed: November 14, 2018
- Predictors of long-acting reversible contraception use among unmarried young adults.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 206: 526.e1-526.e5
- Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011.New England Journal of Medicine. 2016; 374: 843-852
- The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance.Contraception. 2011; 84: e39-e42
- Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics-NC-ND license.2017 (Available:)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Date accessed: November 14, 2018
- Factors associated with choosing a long acting reversible contraceptive method amongst postpartum women in an urban teaching hospital.Contraception. 2010; 82: 197-198
- The impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insurance.Medical Care. 2013; 51: 959-963
- Early impact of the Affordable Care Act on uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.Medical Care. 2016; 54: 811-817
- Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception.Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012; 120: 1291-1297
- A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre- and post-benefit change.Contraception. 2007; 76: 360-365
- Game change in Colorado: Widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2014; 46: 125-132
- The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: Reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 203: 115.e1-115.e7
- Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.New England Journal of Medicine. 2014; 371
- The impact of the Affordable Care Act on contraceptive use and costs among privately insured women.Women’s Health Issues . 2018; 28: 219-223
This work was supported through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Program Award (CD−1304−6117). All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient−Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee.
Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the Penn State College of Medicine. REDCap is supported by the Penn State College of Medicine Clinical & Translational Science Institute, CTSI, NIH/NCATS Grant Number UL1 TR000127.
Author Disclosure Statement: No competing financial interests exist.