Adoption Decision Making among Women Seeking Abortion

Published:January 30, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.11.007

      Abstract

      Background

      Little is known about how adoption factors into pregnancy decision making, particularly when abortion is unavailable.

      Methods

      We used data from the Turnaway Study, a longitudinal study of 956 women seeking abortion, including 231 women denied abortions owing to gestational limits. Through semiannual quantitative interviews, we assessed the frequency with which women denied abortion consider and choose adoption, and, among adoption participants, decision satisfaction. We compared differences in the demographic profiles of parenting and adoption participants using mixed effects regression models. We conducted in-depth interviews with 31 women who received or were denied wanted abortions, including 2 adoption participants, focused on understanding pregnancy decision making and feelings about their choice. Interviews were coded using inductive and deductive methods.

      Results

      Most women who received abortions were aware of but uninterested in adoption. A minority of women denied abortions ( n = 231; 14%) were considering adoption at 1 week after denial. Of participants who gave birth ( n = 161), most (91%) chose parenting. Parenting participants ( n = 146) did not differ from adoption participants ( n = 15) on measures of age, race, or poverty status, although adoption participants were somewhat less likely to be employed (20% vs. 43%; p = .1), and somewhat more likely to have completed high school (87% vs. 74%; p = .08). Although satisfaction with their decision was high among adoption participants, in-depth interviews revealed mixed emotions.

      Conclusions

      Among women motivated to avoid parenthood, as evidenced by abortion seeking, adoption is considered or chosen infrequently. Political promotion of adoption as an alternative to abortion is likely not grounded in the reality of women's decision making.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Aiken A.
        • Borrero S.
        • Callegari L.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        Rethinking the pregnancy planning paradigm: Unintended conceptions or unrepresentative concepts?.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2016; 48: 147-151
        • Bachrach C.
        • Stolley K.
        • London L.
        Relinquishment of premarital births: Evidence from National Survey Data.
        Family Planning Perspectives. 1992; 24: 27-32
        • Bassett L.
        Texas bill would require women to take adoption class before abortion.
        (Huffington Post. Available from:) (Accessed: February 9, 2016)
        • Biggs A.
        • Gould H.
        • Foster D.
        Understanding why women seek abortions in the US.
        BMC Women's Health. 2013; 13: 29
        • Bird C.
        • Rieker P.
        Gender and health: The effects of constrained choices and social policies.
        Cambridge University Press, New York2008
        • Chandra A.
        • Abma J.
        • Maza P.
        • Bachrach C.
        Adoption, adoption seeking, and relinquishment for adoption in the United States.
        Advance Data, National Center for Health Statistics. 1999; : 1-16
        • Charmaz K.
        Constructing grounded theory.
        Sage, London2006
      1. Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2011). How many children were adopted in 2007 and 2008? Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.

        • Christian C.
        • McRoy R.
        • Grotevant H.
        • Bryant C.
        Grief resolution of birthmothers in confidential, time-limited mediated, ongoing mediated, and fully disclosed adoptions.
        Adoption Quarterly. 1997; 1: 35-58
        • Dobkin L.
        • Gould H.
        • Barar R.
        • Ferrari M.
        • Weiss E.
        • Foster D.
        Implementing a prospective study of women seeking abortion in the United States: Understanding and overcoming barriers to recruitment.
        Women's Health Issues. 2014; 24
        • Donnelly B.
        • Voydanoff P.
        Factors associated with releasing for adoption among adolescent mothers.
        Family Relations. 1991; 40: 404-410
        • Early Growth and Development Study
        Agency report: Birth parent summary statistics from all sites.
        2006
        • Ellison M.
        Authoritative knowledge and single women's unintentional pregnancies, abortions, adoption, and single motherhood: Social stigma and structural violence.
        Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2003; 17: 322-347
        • Finer L.
        • Frohwirth L.
        • Dauphinee L.
        • Susheela S.
        • Moore A.
        Reasons US women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2005; 37: 110-118
        • Foster D.
        • Gould H.
        • Taylor J.
        • Weitz T.
        Attitudes and decision making among women seeking abortions at one U.S. clinic.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2012; 44: 117-123
        • Foster D.
        • Kimport K.
        Who seeks abortions at or after 20 weeks?.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2013; 45: 210-218
        • Fravel D.
        • McRoy R.
        • Grotevant H.
        Birthmother perceptions of the psychologically present adopted child: Adoption openness and boundary ambiguity.
        Family Relations. 2000; 49: 425-433
        • Ge X.
        • Natsuaki N.
        • Martin D.
        • Neiderhiser J.
        • Villareal G.
        • Reid J.
        • Reiss D.
        Bridging the divide: Openness in adoption and postadoption psychosocial adjustment among birth and adoptive parents.
        Journal of Family Psychology. 2008; 22: 529-540
        • Grotevant H.
        • McRoy R.
        The Minnesota/Texas Adoption Research Project: Implications of openness in adoption for development and relationship.
        Applied Developmental Science. 1997; 1: 168-186
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: State trends at midyear, 2015.
        Guttmacher Institute, New York2015
        • Hebert L.
        • Fabiyi C.
        • Hasselbacher L.
        • Starr K.
        • Gilliam M.
        Variation in pregnancy options counseling and referrals, and reported proximity to abortion services, among publicly funded family planning facilities.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2016; 48: 65-71
        • Henney S.
        • Ayers-Lopez S.
        • McRoy R.
        • Grotevant H.
        Evolution and resolution: Birthmothers' experience of grief and loss at different levels of adoption openness.
        Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2007; 24: 875-889
        • Joffe C.
        The politicization of abortion and the evolution of abortion counseling.
        American Journal of Public Health. 2013; 103: 57-65
        • Johnson K.
        Protecting women, saving the fetus: Symbolic politics and mandated abortion counseling.
        Women's Studies International Forum. 2014; 47: 36-45
        • Jones R.
        • Frohwirth L.
        • Moore A.
        “I would want to give my child, like, everything in the world”: How issues of motherhood influence women who have abortions.
        Journal of Family Issues. 2008; 29: 79-99
        • Jones R.
        • Jerman J.
        How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008?.
        Journal of Women's Health. 2013; 22: 706-713
        • Jones R.
        • Jerman J.
        Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2014; 46
        • Jones R.
        • Kavanuagh M.
        Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion.
        Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011; 117: 1358-1366
        • Jones R.
        • Kooistra K.
        Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2011; 43: 41-50
        • Krahn L.
        • Sullivan R.
        Grief & loss resolution among birth mothers in open adoption.
        Canadian Social Work Review. 2015; 32: 27-48
        • March for Life Education and Defense Fund
        Adoption: A noble decision.
        2014 (Available from:) (Accessed: February 9, 2016)
        • Miller B.
        • Coyl D.
        Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing in relation to infant adoption in the United States.
        Adoption Quarterly. 2000; 4: 3-25
        • Monte L.
        • Ellis R.
        Current population survey: Fertility of women in the United States: 2012.
        U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC2014
        • Moore N.
        • Davidson J.
        A profile of adoption placers: Perceptions of pregnant teens during the decision-making process.
        Adoption Quarterly. 2002; 6: 29-41
        • Moss D.
        • Snyder M.
        • Lin L.
        Options for women with unintended pregnancy.
        American Academy of Family Physicians. 2015; 91: 27-48
        • Namerow P.
        • Kalmuss D.
        • Cushman L.
        The determinants of young women's pregnancy-resolution choices.
        Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1993; 3: 193-215
        • Namerow P.
        • Kalmuss D.
        • Cushman L.
        The consequences of placing versus parenting among young unmarried women.
        Marriage and Family Review. 1997; 25: 175-197
        • Roberts S.
        • Fuentes L.
        • Kriz R.
        • Williams V.
        • Upadhyay U.
        Implications for women of Louisiana's law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 368-372
        • Roberts S.
        • Gould H.
        • Kimport K.
        • Weitz T.
        • Foster D.
        Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.
        Women's Health Issues. 2013; 24: 211-218
        • Rocca C.
        • Kimport K.
        • Gould H.
        • Foster D.
        Women's emotions one week after receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2013; 45: 122-131
        • Rocca C.
        • Kimport K.
        • Roberts S.
        • Gould H.
        • Neuhaus J.
        • Foster D.
        Decision rightness and emotional responses to abortion in the United States: A longitudinal study.
        Plos One. 2015; 10: e0128832
        • Roe v Wade
        ABC Nightly News.
        ABC News, New York1973
        • Sisson G.
        “Choosing Life”: Birth Mothers on Abortion and Reproductive Choice.
        Women's Health Issues. 2015; 25: 349-354
        • Smith S.
        Safeguarding the rights and well-being of birthparents.
        Donaldson Adoption Institute, New York2007
        • The White House
        Statement by the president on Roe v. Wade anniversary.
        2012 (Available from:) (Accessed: February 9, 2016)
        • Upadhyay U.
        • Weitz T.
        • Jones R.
        • Barar R.
        • Foster D.
        Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States.
        American Journal of Public Health. 2014; 104: 1687-1694

      Biography

      Gretchen Sisson, PhD, is a research sociologist with Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, at the University of California, San Francisco. Her research focuses on social constructions and representations of parenthood and reproductive choice, including abortion/adoption.

      Biography

      Lauren Ralph, PhD, MPH, is an epidemiologist at the ANSIRH at the University of California, San Francisco. Her research analyzes the consequences of unintended pregnancy, with a particular focus on adolescents and young adults.

      Biography

      Heather Gould, MPH, is a senior research analyst at ANSIRH at the University of California, San Francisco and research director of the Turnaway Study. She is interested in women's reproductive health outcomes related to unintended pregnancy, abortion, and childbirth, and experiences accessing and receiving health services.

      Biography

      Diana Greene Foster, PhD, is a demographer, Director of Research at ANSIRH at the University of California, San Francisco, and principal investigator of the Turnaway Study. Her work examines family planning policies and the effect of unintended pregnancy on women's lives.