Advertisement

Sick of Inequality: Gender and Support for Paid Sick Days

      Abstract

      Background

      The availability of paid sick days (PSD) is on the forefront of policy issues relating to women's health and well-being. Previous research regarding PSD and other forms of family–work balance legislation has linked access to paid time off from work for addressing one's own or another's health concerns to a range of health benefits for working women and their families. In general, public support for such policies is high, but little work has tested the extent to which support extends to PSD. Researchers have yet to engage in a rigorous statistical analysis of public opinion on PSD, including whether opinion varies by gender.

      Methods

      Using data from a 2013 poll of adults in New Jersey (n = 925), we bridged this research gap by conducting the first multivariate analysis of public attitudes toward PSD.

      Results

      As expected, we found markedly high levels of support for PSD across all respondents, with a preponderance of most sociodemographic categories supporting proposed PSD legislation in New Jersey. We also found that gender was a strong predictor of support for PSD, with women significantly (odds ratio, 1.916; p ≤ .01) more likely than men to be in favor of such legislation.

      Conclusions

      We discuss the implications of our findings for future work on PSD as well as for research concerning women, wellness, and work-life legislation more broadly.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Anzalone Liszt Research
        Paid sick day legislation polling summary.
        Author, Montgomery, AL2011
        • AuClaire P.A.
        Public attitudes toward social welfare expenditures.
        Social Work. 1984; 29: 139-144
        • Boots S.W.
        • Martinson K.
        • Danziger A.
        Employers' perspectives on San Francisco's Paid Sick Leave policy.
        The Urban Institute, Washington, DC2009 (Available:) (Accessed September 19, 2013)
        • ComPsych Corporation
        Poll: 83 percent of workers say they work while sick, up from 77 percent previously.
        (Press release) Author, Chicago2008
        • Fenwick R.
        • Olson J.
        Support for worker participation: Attitudes among union and non-union workers.
        American Sociological Review. 1986; 51: 505-522
        • Galinsky E.
        • Bond J.T.
        • Hill E.J.
        When work works, a status report on workplace flexibility: Who has it? Who wants it? What difference does it make?.
        Families and Work Institute, New York2004 (Available:) (Accessed September 19, 2013)
        • Henrekson M.
        • Persson M.
        The effects on sick leave of changes in the sickness insurance system.
        Journal of Labor Economics. 2004; 22: 87-113
        • Heymann J.
        • Rho H.J.
        • Schmitt J.
        • Earle A.
        Contagion nation: A comparison of paid sick day policies in 22 countries.
        Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC2009 (Available:) (Accessed September 17, 2013)
        • Hill H.D.
        Paid sick leave and job stability.
        Work and Occupations. 2013; 40: 143-173
        • Hills S.M.
        The attitudes of union and nonunion male workers toward union representation.
        Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1985; 38: 179-194
      1. Institute for Women's Policy Research. (2010). Majority of workers support workplace flexibility, job quality, and family support policies. Available: http://www.iwpr.org/press-room/press-releases/majority-of-workers-support-workplace-flexibility-job-quality-and-family-support-policies. Accessed November 19, 2013.

        • Leiter V.
        Dilemmas in sharing care: Maternal provision of professionally driven therapy for children with disabilities.
        Social Science & Medicine. 2004; 58: 837-849
        • Leiter V.
        • Krauss M.W.
        • Anderson B.
        • Wells N.
        The consequences of caring: Effects of mothering a child with special needs.
        Journal of Family Issues. 2004; 25: 379-403
        • Lovell V.
        No time to be sick.
        Institute for Women's Policy Research, Washington, DC2004 (Available:) (Accessed September 17, 2013)
        • Mastekaasa A.
        Parenthood, gender, and sickness absence.
        Social Science & Medicine. 2000; 50: 1827-1842
        • Milkman R.
        • Appelbaum E.
        Unfinished business: Paid Family Leave in California and the future of U.S. work-family policy.
        Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY2013
        • Miller K.
        • Williams C.
        Valuing good health in Massachusetts: The costs and benefits of paid sick days.
        Institute for Women's Policy Research, Washington, DC2012 (Available:) (Accessed October 7, 2013)
        • National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP
        Caregiving in the U.S.
        National Alliance for Caregiving, Bethesda, MD2009 (Available:) (Accessed September 17, 2013)
      2. National Partnership for Women and Families. (2011a). Memorandum RE: Survey findings on Connecticut paid sick leave law. Available: (http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/work-family/psd/poll-survey-findings-on-ct-paid-sick-leave-law.pdf). Accessed February 23, 2015.

      3. National Partnership for Women and Families. (2011b). Re: Findings and political implications for paid sick day legislation. Available: http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/work-family/psd/poll-findings-and-political-implications-psd-legislation.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2015.

      4. National Partnership for Women and Families. (2014). Re: Economic security issues for women and families in the 2014 midterm election, as presented on candidates' campaign websites. Available: http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/work-family/2014-midterm-election-candidates-campaign-website-analysis.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2015.

        • O'Connor R.
        • Hayes J.
        • Gault B.
        Paid sick days access varies by race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and job characteristics.
        Institute for Women's Policy Research, Washington, DC2014 (Available:) (Accessed February 23, 2015)
      5. Oxfam America. (2013). Hard work, hard lives. Available: http://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/research-publications/hard-work-hard-lives/. Accessed February 23, 2015.

        • Parker K.
        The big generation gap at the polls is echoed in attitudes on budget tradeoffs.
        Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends, Washington, DC2012 (Available:) (Accessed October 14, 2014)
        • Ross Phillips K.
        Getting time off: Access to leave among working parents. Urban Institute New Federalism.
        (Series B, No. B-57) The Urban Institute, Washington, DC2004 (Available:) (Accessed October 6, 2013)
        • Smith T.W.
        • Kim J.
        Paid sick days: Attitudes and experiences.
        National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, Chicago2010
        • Smith K.
        • Schaefer A.
        Who cares for the sick kids? Parents access to shared time to care for a sick child.
        University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH2012 (Available:) (Accessed February 23, 2015)
        • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
        Selected paid leave benefits: Access, National Compensation Survey, March 2014.
        U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC2014 (Available:) (Accessed February 23, 2015)
        • Vistnes J.P.
        Gender differences in days lost from work due to illness.
        Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1997; 50: 304-323
        • Wyn R.
        • Ojeda V.
        • Ranji U.
        • Salganicoff A.
        Women, work, and family health: A balancing act.
        Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Washington, DC2003 (Available:) (Accessed September 17, 2013)
      6. YouGov. (2013). Omnibus poll. Available: http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/toplines_paidleave_0617182013.pdf. Accessed November 19, 2013.

      Biography

      Danielle J. Lindemann is Assistant Research Professor and Research Director of the Center for Women and Work at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. She has research interests in gender, sexuality, work, and culture.

      Biography

      Linda Houser is an Assistant Professor and Doctoral Program Director at Widener University's Center for Social Work Education. Her research focuses on public policy in the areas of employment, caregiving, health, and economic security.

      Biography

      Karen White is Director of the Working Families Program at the Center for Women and Work at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. Her focus is on how research informs policy, particularly policies that affect working women and their families.