We sought to evaluate the concordance between self-assessed perceptions of fracture risk and actual risk calculated by World Health Organization's 10-year Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX).
We collected demographic data, lifestyle information, osteoporosis knowledge, bone density test results, and treatment history from patients aged 50 to 75 years. Subjects rated their perceptions of 10-year risk of sustaining fracture as low (0%–9%), intermediate (10%–19%), or high (≥20%). This rating was compared with risk calculated by FRAX.
Among 426 patients, the greatest agreement regarding fracture risk was noted for those in the low-risk FRAX group: 81% perceived themselves as having low risk. The most risk disagreement was in the high-risk FRAX group: Only 18% perceived their risk as high. Perceived risk was intermediate for 59% and low for 24%. Of patients at intermediate calculated risk by FRAX, 48% agreed with this with self-perceived risk. Overall, risk agreement was associated with bone density results, with higher T scores predictive of agreement. Underestimation was associated with being female and older. Patients with prescription treatment exposure frequently had risk disagreement and perceived their risk as lower than their calculated FRAX scores might indicate. Patients taking calcium and vitamin D similarly perceived lower risk than calculated by FRAX.
Patients at intermediate and high calculated fracture risk frequently had self-perceptions of lower risk. Patients taking prescription osteoporosis medication and calcium and vitamin D treatment perceived less risk than calculated. Whether correcting misperceptions about personal susceptibility to fracture might result in behavioral changes will be determined.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Minimal error in self-report of having had DXA, but self-report of its results was poor.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007; 60: 1306-1311
- Osteoporosis beliefs and antiresorptive medication use.Maturitas. 2005; 50: 196-208
- Osteoporosis knowledge, health beliefs, and DXA T-scores in men and women 50 years of age and older.Orthopaedic Nursing. 2007; 26: 243-250
- FRAX® counseling for bone health behavior change in women 50 years of age and older.Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2012; 24: 382-389
- Reasons and risk: Factors underlying women's perceptions of susceptibility to osteoporosis.Maturitas. 2006; 55: 227-237
- Increased osteoporosis screening rates associated with the provision of a preventive health examination.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM. 2009; 22: 655-662
- Health beliefs and attitudes toward the prevention of osteoporosis in older women.Menopause. 2001; 8: 372-376
- The health belief model: A decade later.Health Education Monographs. 1984; 11: 1-47
- Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo.Osteoporosis International. 2000; 11: 669-674
- Fracture risk assessment without bone density measurement in routine clinical practice.Osteoporosis International. 2012; 23: 75-85
- Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Author, Washington, DC2010
- Osteoporosis education programs: Changing knowledge and behaviors.Public Health Nursing. 2000; 17: 398-402
- Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada.Canadian Association of Radiol Journal. 2005; 56: 178-188
- Failure to perceive increased risk of fracture in women 55years and older: The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).Osteoporosis International. 2011; 22: 27-35
- Bone health and osteoporosis: A report of the Surgeon General.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MD2004
- Knowledge about osteoporosis: Assessment, correlates and outcomes.Osteoporosis International. 2005; 16: 115-127
World Health Organization. (n.d.). FRAX: World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. Geneva: Author.
- Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.Circulation. 1998; 97: 1837-1847
- The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: The Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT).BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2003; 4: 17
Dr. Grover is an Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and a Research Scholar of the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery. His research interests include cost conscious care and guideline adherence.
Dr. Edwards is an Assistant Professor and Chairman of Family Medicine. He has research interests in assessing tools to improve physicians' clinical productivity and their communication with patients.
Dr. Chang is a Biostatistician and Research Associate in the Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Services Research. She advises and collaborates with investigators in research protocol design as well as performing statistical analyses and assisting in manuscript preparation.
Dr. Cook is Professor of Medicine and Chair, Division of Endocrinology. An author of over 100 manuscripts, he actively mentors junior investigators while continuing an active research program which includes advancing inpatient diabetes management.
Dr. Behrens is an Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and holds a Certificate of Added Qualifications in Geriatric Medicine. She is active in the American Medical Directors Association and leads medical student educational activities for the Department.
Dr. Dueck is a Senior Associate Consultant and Assistant Professor of Biostatistics. She collaborates frequently with investigators in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center while providing insights into study design, data analyses and manuscript preparation.
Accepted: November 19, 2013
Received in revised form: November 15, 2013
Received: February 1, 2013
Conflict of Interest: We have none to report, financial or otherwise.
Portions of this manuscript have been published in abstract form: Osteoporos Int 2011;22 (Suppl. 2):S421.
© 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.