Advertisement

Pap, Mammography, and Clinical Breast Examination Screening Among Women with Disabilities: A Systematic Review

      Abstract

      Background

      Research has found some disparities between U.S. women with and without disabilities in receiving clinical preventive services. Substantial differences may also exist within the population of women with disabilities. The current study examined published research on Pap smears, mammography, and clinical breast examinations across disability severity levels among women with disabilities.

      Methods

      Informed by an expert panel, we followed guidelines for systematic literature reviews and searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cinahl databases. We also reviewed in-depth four disability- or preventive service-relevant journals. Two reviewers independently extracted data from all selected articles.

      Findings

      Five of 74 reviewed publications of met all our inclusion criteria and all five reported data on Pap smears, mammography, and clinical breast examination. Articles classified disability severity groups by functional and/or activity levels. Associations between disability severity and Pap smear use were inconsistent across the publications. Mammography screening fell as disability level increased according to three of the five studies. Results demonstrated modestly lower screening, but also were inconsistent for clinical breast examinations across studies.

      Conclusion

      Evidence is inconsistent concerning disparities in these important cancer screening services with increasing disability levels. Published studies used differing methods and definitions, adding to concerns about the evidence for screening disparities rising along with increasing disability. More focused research is required to determine whether significant disparities exist in cancer screening among women with differing disability levels. This information is essential for national and local public health and health care organizations to target interventions to improve care for women with disabilities.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Allen S.M.
        • Wieland S.
        • Griffin J.
        • Gozalo P.
        Continuity in provider and site of care and preventive services receipt in an adult Medicaid population with physical disabilities.
        Disability and Health Journal. 2009; 2: 180-187
        • Altman B.
        • Bernstein A.
        Disability and health in the United States, 2001–2005. DHHS publication no. (PHS) 2008–1035).
        National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD2008
        • Arksey H.
        • O'Malley L.
        Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework.
        International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8: 19-32
        • Armour B.S.
        • Swanson M.
        • Waldman H.B.
        • Perlman S.P.
        A profile of state-level differences in the oral health of people with and without disabilities, in the U.S., in 2004.
        Public Health Reports. 2008; 123: 67-75
        • Barr J.K.
        • Giannotti T.E.
        • Van Hoof T.J.
        • Mongoven J.
        • Curry M.
        Understanding barriers to participation in mammography by women with disabilities.
        American Journal of Health Promotion. 2008; 22: 381-385
        • Burns M.E.
        Medicaid managed care and health care access for adult beneficiaries with disabilities.
        Health Services Research. 2009; 44 (Retrieved from): 1521-1541
        • Carney C.P.
        • Allen J.
        • Doebbeling B.N.
        Receipt of clinical preventive medical services among psychiatric patients.
        Psychiatric Services. 2002; 53: 1028-1030
        • Cheng E.
        • Myers L.
        • Wolf S.
        • Shatin D.
        • Cui X.P.
        • Ellison G.
        • et al.
        Mobility impairments and use of preventive services in women with multiple sclerosis: Observational study.
        BMJ. 2001; 323: 968-969
        • Chevarley F.M.
        • Thierry J.M.
        • Gill C.J.
        • Ryerson A.B.
        • Nosek M.A.
        Health, preventive health care, and health care access among women with disabilities in the 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey, Supplement on Disability.
        Womens Health Issues. 2006; 16: 297-312
        • Coughlin T.A.
        • Long S.K.
        • Kendall S.
        Health care access, use, and satisfaction among disabled Medicaid beneficiaries.
        Health Care Financing Review. 2002; 24: 115-136
        • Courtney-Long E.
        • Armour B.
        • Frammartino B.
        • Miller J.
        Factors associated with self-reported mammography use for women with and women without a disability.
        Journal of Women's Health. 2011; 20: 1279-1286
        • Daumit G.L.
        • Crum R.M.
        • Guallar E.
        • Ford D.E.
        Receipt of preventive medical services at psychiatric visits by patients with severe mental illness.
        Psychiatric Services. 2002; 53: 884-887
        • Diab M.E.
        • Johnston M.V.
        Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services.
        Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004; 85: 749-757
        • Folsom D.P.
        • McCahill M.
        • Bartels S.J.
        • Lindamer L.A.
        • Ganiats T.G.
        • Jeste D.V.
        Medical comorbidity and receipt of medical care by older homeless people with schizophrenia or depression.
        Psychiatric Services. 2002; 53: 1456-1460
        • Havercamp S.M.
        • Scandlin D.
        • Roth M.
        Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina.
        Public Health Reports. 2004; 119: 418-426
      1. Higgins J.P.T. Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, England2008
        • Iezzoni L.I.
        • McCarthy E.P.
        • Davis R.B.
        • Harris-David L.
        • O'Day B.
        Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities.
        American Journal of Medical Quality. 2001; 16: 135-144
        • Iezzoni L.I.
        • McCarthy E.P.
        • Davis R.B.
        • Siebens H.
        Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services.
        American Journal of Public Health. 2000; 90: 955-961
        • Kroll T.
        • Neri M.T.
        Use of primary prevention services among male adults with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury in managed care and fee-for-service.
        Managed Care Quarterly. 2004; 12: 6-10
        • Madans J.
        • Loeb M.
        • Altman B.
        Measuring disability and monitoring the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: The work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics.
        BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: S4
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Medicine. 2009; 6: 1-6
        • Neri S.V.
        • Bradley E.H.
        • Groce N.E.
        Frequency of HIV testing among persons with disabilities: Results from the national health interview survey, 2002.
        AIDS Education and Prevention. 2007; 19: 545-554
        • Nosek M.A.
        • Gill C.J.
        Use of cervical and breast cancer screening among women with and without functional limitations: United States, 1994-1995.
        MMWR - Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 1998; 47: 853-856
      2. Peterson, J. J., Walsh, E. S., Drum, C. E., & The Expert Panel on Health and Health Care Disparities among Individuals with Disabilities. (Submitted). Disparities in the utilization of clinical preventive services among subgroups of the population with disabilities: A systematic scoping review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

        • Petticrew M.
        • Roberts H.
        Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide.
        Blackwell, Malden, MA2006
        • Rothman K.J.
        • Greenland S.
        • Lash T.L.
        Modern epidemiology.
        3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2008
        • Salsberry P.J.
        • Chipps E.
        • Kennedy C.
        Use of general medical services among Medicaid patients with severe and persistent mental illness.
        Psychiatric Services. 2005; 56: 458-462
        • Schenck A.P.
        • Peacock S.C.
        • Klabunde C.N.
        • Lapin P.
        • Coan J.F.
        • Brown M.L.
        Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the Medicare population, 1998-2005.
        American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009; 37: 1-7
        • Suzuki R.
        • Krahn G.
        • Small E.
        • Peterson-Besse J.
        Multi-level barriers to obtaining mammograms for women with mobility limitations: post workshop evaluation.
        American Journal of Health Behavior. 2013; 37: 711-718
        • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        Healthy people 2010.
        U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2000
      3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.a). Affordable Care Act for Americans With Disabilities. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://www.hhs.gov/od/affordable_care_act.html.

      4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.b). People With Disabilities and the Affordable Care Act: Fact sheets. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2011/08/people-with-disabilities.html.

        • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        Healthy people 2020.
        (ODPHP Publication No. B0132) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD2010
      5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. (2011). Final data collection standards for race, ethnicity, primary language, sex, and disability status required by section 4302 of the affordable care act. Retrieved September 5, 2012, from http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlid=208.

        • U.S. Preventative Services Task Force
        Screening for breast cancer: Recommendations and rationale.
        Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 344-346
        • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
        The guide to clinical preventive services.
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2009
      6. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). (2010). Recommendations. Retrieved May 21, 2012, from http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/recommendations.htm.

      7. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). (2012). Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Retrieved September 11, 2012, from http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscerv.htm.

        • Wei W.
        • Findley P.A.
        • Sambamoorthi U.
        Disability and receipt of clinical preventive services among women.
        Womens Health Issues. 2006; 16: 286-296
        • Wisdom J.P.
        • McGee M.G.
        • Horner-Johnson W.
        • Michael Y.L.
        • Adams E.
        • Berlin M.
        Health disparities between women with and without disabilities: A review of the research.
        Social Work in Public Health. 2010; 25: 368-386
        • World Health Organization
        International classification of functioning, disability and health.
        Author, Geneva2001
      8. World Health Organization. (2013). Social determinants of health. Retrieved February 8, 2013, from http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/.

        • Yankaskas B.C.
        • Dickens P.
        • Bowling J.M.
        • Jarman M.P.
        • Luken K.
        • Salisbury K.
        • et al.
        Barriers to adherence to screening mammography among women with disabilities.
        American Journal of Public Health. 2010; 100: 947-953

      Biography

      Elena Andresen is Professor of Epidemiology, Chief of the Disability and Health Research Group, and Director of the Oregon Office on Disability and Health at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon.

      Biography

      Jana Peterson-Besse is Assistant Professor of Public Health at Pacific University in Forest Grove, Oregon.

      Biography

      Gloria Krahn is division director for the Division on Human Development and Disability at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia. She was formerly professor of public health and preventive medicine at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon.

      Biography

      Emily Walsh is a research associate with the Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center in Portland, Oregon. She was a research associate at Oregon Health & Science University at the time this work was completed.

      Biography

      Willi Horner-Johnson is a Research Assistant Professor of Public Health and Preventive Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon. Her research focuses on disparities in health and access to healthcare for adults with disabilities.

      Biography

      Lisa Iezzoni is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Mongan Institute for Health Policy at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Dr. Iezzoni is a member of the Institute of Medicine in the National Academy of Sciences.