Advertisement

Urban–Rural Differences in Attitudes and Practices Toward Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives among Family Planning Providers in Texas

Published:January 24, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.11.004

      Abstract

      Background

      Despite the elevated rates of teen and unplanned pregnancies across the United States, long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) remain a less utilized birth control method. The present study investigated family planning providers’ attitudes and considerations when recommending family planning methods and LARCs to clients. Additionally, this study explored whether urban–rural differences exist in providers’ attitudes toward LARCs and in clients’ use of LARCs.

      Methods

      Data were collected using an online survey of family planning providers at Title X clinics in Texas. Survey data was linked to family planning client data from the Family Planning Annual Report (2008).

      Results

      Findings indicated that, although providers were aware of the advantages of LARCs, clients’ LARC use remains infrequent. Providers reported that the benefits of hormone implants include their effectiveness for 3 years and that they are an option for women who cannot take estrogen-based birth control. Providers acknowledged the benefits of several types of LARCs; however, urban providers were more likely to acknowledge the benefits of hormone implants compared with their rural counterparts. Results also indicated barriers to recommending LARCs, such as providers’ misinformation about LARCs and their caution in recommending LARCs to adolescents. However, findings also indicated providers lack training in LARC insertion, specifically among those practicing in rural areas.

      Conclusions

      In light of the effectiveness and longevity of LARCs, teenagers and clients living in rural areas are ideal LARC candidates. Increased training among family planning providers, especially for those practicing in rural areas, may increase their recommendations of LARCs to clients.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Atav S.
        • Spencer G.
        Health risk behaviors among adolescents attending rural, suburban, and urban schools: A comparative study.
        Family & Community Health. 2002; 25: 53-64
        • Bennett T.
        Reproductive health care in the rural United States.
        Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002; 287: 112-119
        • Bennett T.
        • Skatrud J.D.
        • Guild P.
        • Loda F.
        • Klerman L.V.
        Rural adolescent pregnancy: A View from the south.
        Family Planning Perspectives. 1997; 29: 256-260
        • Bryant A.
        • Kovar C.L.
        • Luchowski A.T.
        Pills are not enough: The case for long-acting reversible contraceptives - and how North Carolinians can benefit.
        North Carolina Medical Journal. 2009; 70
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC)
        Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data.
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta2007
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC)
        Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data.
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta2010
        • Cooling H.
        • Dunster W.
        Nurse intrauterine device training.
        Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2008; 34: 193-194
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Meyn L.A.
        • Borgatta L.
        • Barnhart K.
        • Jensen J.
        • Burke A.E.
        • et al.
        Multicenter Comparison of the Contraceptive Ring and Patch: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2008; 111
        • Deans E.I.
        • Grimes D.A.
        Intrauterine devices for adolescents: A systematic review.
        Contraception. 2009; 79: 418-423
        • Edelman M.A.
        • Menz B.L.
        Selected comparisons and implications of a national rural and urban survey on health care access, demographics, and policy issues.
        Journal of Rural Health. 1996; 12: 197-205
        • Farmer L.
        • Everett S.
        Non-hormonal contraception. Obstetrics.
        Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine. 2008; 18: 33-38
        • Finer L.B.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994–2001.
        Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
        • Frank M.L.
        • Poindexter A.N.
        • Johnson M.L.
        • Bateman L.
        Characteristics and attitudes of early contraceptive implant acceptors in Texas.
        Family Planning Perspectives. 1992; 24: 208-214
        • Gardner J.
        • Miller L.
        Promoting the safety and use of hormonal contraceptives.
        Journal of Women’s Health. 2005; 14: 53-60
        • Glasier A.
        Should healthcare professionals be advocating long-acting reversible contraception?.
        Women’s Health. 2009; 5: 1-4
        • Hairon N.
        Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception.
        Nursing Times. 2008; 104: 23-24
      1. Harel, Z., & Cromer, B. (1999). The use of long-acting contraceptives in adolescents. Adolescent Gynecology, Part II: The Sexually Active Adolescent, 46, 719–734.

        • Madden T.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Hladky K.J.
        • Secura G.M.
        • Peipert J.F.
        Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: A survey of obstetrician and gynecologists’ knowledge and attitudes.
        Contraception. 2010; 81: 112-116
        • Moskowitz E.
        • Jennings B.
        Directive counseling on long-acting contraception.
        American Journal of Public Health. 1996; 86: 787-791
        • Mueller K.J.
        • Ortega S.T.
        • Parker K.
        • Patil K.
        • Askenazi A.
        Health status and access to care among rural minorities.
        Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 1999; 10: 230-249
        • National Center for Health Statistics, & Office of Analysis and Epidemiology
        Urban–rural classification scheme for counties.
        Author, Hyattsville, MD2006
        • Rabinowitz H.K.
        • Paynter N.P.
        The rural vs. urban practice decisions.
        Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002; 287: 113
        • Stevens–Simon C.
        A village would be nice but.It takes a long-acting contraceptive to prevent repeat adolescent pregnancies.
        American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001; 21: 60-65
      2. Sullivan, K. (2009). 2007 Annual report: Texas Pregnancy Risk Assessment Management System. Austin: Division of Family and Community Health Services, Texas Department of State Health Services.

        • Tanfer K.
        • Wierbicki S.
        • Payn B.
        Why are U.S. women not using long-acting contraceptives?.
        Family Planning Perspectives. 2000; 32: 176-185
      3. Texas Department of State Health Services. (2006). Natality files.

      4. Texas Department of State Health Services. (2008). Family Planning Annual Report (FPAR).

      5. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Fact Sheet: Teen Pregnancy Rates in the United States, 1999–2002.

        • Trussell J.
        Choosing a contraceptive: Efficacy, safety, and personal considerations.
        in: Contraceptive Technology. Ardent, New York2008
        • van Dis J.
        Where we live: Health care in rural vs urban America.
        Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002; 287: 108
        • Wambach K.A.
        • Cole C.
        Breastfeeding and adolescents.
        Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2006; 29: 282-294
        • Wellings K.
        • Zhihong Z.
        • Krental A.
        • Barrett G.
        • Glasier A.
        Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK.
        Contraception. 2007; 76: 208-214
        • Zidenberg N.
        • DeSilva N.
        • Gilliam M.
        • Espey E.
        Intrauterine device and adolescents.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007; 110: 1493-1495

      Biography

      Margaret L. Vaaler, PhD, is a Research Specialist at the Texas Department of State Health Services. Her research interests focus on the relationship between attitudes and health behaviors, patterns in help-seeking behavior, health disparities, and maternal and child health.

      Biography

      Lauri K. Kalanges, MD, MPH, is currently the Section Director and Medical Director for Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention at the Texas Department of State Health Services.

      Biography

      Vincent P. Fonseca, MD, MPH, is the Director of Medical Informatics at Intellica Corporation and the co-founder of the Population Health Institute of Texas. His interests are improving the delivery of publicly funded health-related services and improving the health of defined populations.

      Biography

      Brian C. Castrucci, MA, is the Director of the Maternal and Child Health program at the Georgia Department of Community Health.