Massachusetts has implemented reforms aimed at providing universal health care coverage and covers abortion through subsidized state insurance programs. Three Massachusetts abortion funds evaluated their referral processes for low-income women from April to October 2010 to learn about women’s experiences applying for subsidized insurance and to identify barriers to obtaining insurance or its use for abortion services.
Follow-up interviews were conducted with 39 low-income women thought eligible for subsidized insurance at least 1 month after their initial contact with the funds.
Health insurance literacy was low, and participants reported confusion distinguishing between levels of subsidized insurance. The process of applying for subsidized insurance delayed a substantial proportion of procedures. More than two thirds of the women who applied for state coverage had become insured or expected to become insured shortly, but only one third of respondents who applied were able to secure insurance in time for their abortion care. Two women were unable to obtain abortions as a result of delays. Delays also limited low-income women’s ability to obtain medication abortion.
This analysis suggests that the process for enrolling in subsidized insurance does not currently meet the goal of providing women with coverage for abortion care (and other health needs) in a timely way. Systemic improvements are needed to ensure that enrollments are processed quickly and disruptions in coverage are minimized. Information resources should be developed to help women and their families understand health insurance and coverage of services.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States.Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004; 103: 729-737
- Young adults, health insurance & access to contraception in the wake of health care reform: Results from focus group discussions in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA2010
- The heart of the matter: Public funding of abortion for poor women in the United States.”.Guttmacher Policy Review. 2007; 10: 1
- Rights without access: Revisiting public funding of abortion for poor women.The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy. 2000; 3: 8-11
- The effects of short term variation in abortion funding on pregnancy outcomes.Journal of Health Economics. 1999; 18: 241-257
- Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester.Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006; 107: 128-135
- Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States.Contraception. 2006; 74: 334-344
- The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2003; 35: 16-24
- The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor.Family Planning Perspectives. 1984; 16: 171-180
- Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients, 2008.Guttmacher Institute, New York2010
- The effect of Medicaid abortion funding restrictions on abortions, pregnancies, and births.Journal of Health Economics. 1996; 15: 555-578
- Health insurance coverage and access to care in Massachusetts: Detailed tabulations based on the 2009 Massachusetts Health Insurance Survey.Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy. 2009; (Available:) (Accessed October 15, 2010)
- Effects on pregnancy outcomes of changes in the North Caroline state abortion fund.Population Research and Policy Review. 2002; 21: 319-338
- Abortion funding: A matter of justice.National Network of Abortion Funds, Boston2005
- Abortion rates and universal health care.New England Journal of Medicine. 2010; 362 (Available:) (Accessed October 30, 2010)
Danielle Bessett, PhD, was an Ellertson Fellow from 2008–2010 and is now Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Her research interests are in medical and family sociology, focusing on sexual and reproductive health issues and inequality.
Katey Gorski studies Government at Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts, and expects to receive her BA in the spring of 2011. She interns with the Abortion Rights Fund of Western Massachusetts.
Deepani Jinadasa, MPH, is a member of the Board of Directors of the Eastern Massachusetts Abortion Fund. Her public health interests include better understanding health disparities, social determinants of health, and barriers to healthcare access.
Marcy Ostrow has a BS in Zoology from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. She is the Intake Hotline Coordinator, a hotline volunteer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Jane Fund of Central Massachusetts.
Megan J. Peterson is the Deputy Director of the National Network of Abortion Funds where she works to ensure access to abortion for low-income women through policy advocacy and support to member Funds who provide financial assistance to women in need.
Accepted: February 9, 2011
Received in revised form: January 22, 2011
Received: November 12, 2010
© 2011 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.