At least one national study has shown that most women having abortions have consulted with male partners before terminating a pregnancy. However, little is known about the extent to which women perceive men to be supportive of their abortion decisions or which relationship characteristics are associated with male knowledge of and support for the abortion.
We used data from a nationally representative sample of 9,493 women obtaining abortions to examine perceptions of male knowledge and support for the abortion according to three relationship characteristics: Union status, length of relationship, and exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV).
The overwhelming majority of women reported that the men with whom they got pregnant knew about the abortion, and most perceived these men to be supportive. Cohabiting and, to a lesser extent, married women as well as those in longer relationships were more likely to report both of these outcomes, even after controlling for demographic characteristics. Exposure to IPV by the man involved in the pregnancy, reported by 7% of abortion patients, substantially reduced the likelihood that women perceived the men to know about or to be supportive of the abortion.
Our results suggest that most women obtaining abortions are able to rely on male partners for social support. Education and counseling efforts that incorporate or reach out to male partners may increase support for women obtaining abortions. However, this strategy may not be appropriate for all women, especially those exposed to IPV.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Couples counseling at an abortion clinic: A pilot study.Contraception. 2008; 78: 424-431
Center for Impact Research. (2000). Domestic violence and birth control sabotage: A report from the teen parent project. Chicago, IL: Center for Impact Research.
- Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health?.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2007; 8: 149-177
- On-again/off-again dating relationships: How are they different from other dating relationships?.Personal Relationships. 2009; 16: 23-47
- Prevalence of domestic violence among women seeking abortion services.Women’s Health Issues. 1996; 6: 204-210
- Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States.Contraception. 2006; 74: 334-344
- Characteristics of women undergoing repeat induced abortion.CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2005; 172: 637-641
- Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
- Public or private providers? U.S. women’s use of reproductive health services 121.Family Planning Perspectives. 2001; 33: 4-12
- The prevalence of domestic violence among women seeking abortion.Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1998; 91: 1002-1006
- Impact of partner abuse on women’s reproductive lives.Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association. 2005; 60: 42-45
- The characteristics and prior contraceptive use of U.S. abortion patients.Family Planning Perspectives. 1988; 20: 158-168
- Abortion patients in 1994-1995: Characteristics and contraceptive use.Family Planning Perspectives. 1996; 28: 140-158
- Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions 2000-2001.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2002; 34: 226-235
- Abortion in the United States: Incidence and access to services, 2005.Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2008; 40: 6-16
- Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients, 2008.Guttmacher Institute, New York2010
- Prevalence of intimate partner violence and health implications for women using emergency departments and primary care clinics.Women Health Issues. 2004; 14: 19-29
- A comparison of the prevalence of domestic violence between patients seeking termination of pregnancy and other general gynecology patients.International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2002; 77: 47-54
- Male partners’ appraisals of undesired pregnancy and abortion: Implications for women’s adjustment to abortion.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1992; 22: 599-614
- Mixed messages: Implications of social conflict and social support within close relationships for adjustment to a stressful life event.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997; 72: 1349-1363
- Male partner pregnancy-promoting behaviors and adolescent partner violence: Findings from a qualitative study with adolescent females.Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2007; 7: 360-366
- Registered providers.(Available:)Accessed, October 8, 2010)
- Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States.Social Science and Medicine. 2010; 70: 1737-1744
- Screening women and elderly adults for family and intimate partner violence: A review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004; 140: 387-396
- Age, period, and cohort effects on intimate partner violence.Violence Victims. 2009; 24: 627-638
- Disclosure and health-seeking behaviour following intimate partner violence before and during pregnancy in Flanders, Belgium: A survey surveillance study.European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2008; 137: 37-42
- Prevalence of intimate partner violence among an abortion clinic population.American Journal of Public Health. 2010; 100: 1412-1415
- Male perpetration of intimate partner violence and involvement in abortions and abortion-related conflict.American Journal of Public Health. 2010; 100: 1415-1417
- Abortion disclosure and the association with domestic violence.Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005; 105: 1329-1334
Rachel K. Jones and Ann M. Moore are Senior Research Associates, and Lori F. Frohwirth is a Research Associate, all at the Guttmacher Institute.
Published online: January 31, 2011
Accepted: October 28, 2010
Received in revised form: October 28, 2010
Received: June 18, 2010
Funded by an anonymous donor.
© 2011 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.