Advertisement

A disease-specific Medicaid expansion for women

the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000

      Abstract

      The Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000 (BCCPTA) allows states the option of extending Medicaid eligibility to women diagnosed with breast or cervical cancer through a large federal screening program that does not include resources for treatment. Using qualitative data from interviews with 22 key informants and other sources, we present an analysis of the history and passage of the BCCPTA as a policy response to a perceived “treatment gap” in a national screening program. The results suggest that organizational policy entrepreneurs—primarily the National Breast Cancer Coalition—constructed an effective problem definition (that the government screening program was “unethical” and “broken”) with a viable policy solution (an optional disease-specific Medicaid expansion), and pushed this proposal through a policy window opened by a budget surplus and an election year in which women’s health issues had broad bipartisan appeal.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Women's Health Issues
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rosenbaum S.
        Medicaid.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 635-640
        • Buck J.A.
        • Kamlet M.S.
        Problems with expanding Medicaid for the uninsured.
        J Health Pol Policy Law. 1993; 18: 1-25
        • Schroeder P.
        • Snowe O.
        The politics of women’s health.
        in: Costello C. Stone A.J. The American woman: 1994–95. W.W. Norton & Company, New York1994: 91-108
        • Henson R.M.
        • Wyatt S.W.
        • Lee N.C.
        The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
        J Public Health Manage Pract. 1996; 2: 36-47
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: At-A-Glance 2001. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2001

        • Blumer H.
        Social problems as collective behavior.
        Social Problems. 1971; 18: 298-306
        • Spector M.
        • Kitsuse J.I.
        Constructing social problems. Cummings, Menlo Park, CA1977
      2. Brown P. Naming and framing: the social construction of diagnosis and illness. J Health Soc Behav 1995;extra issue: 34–52

        • Hilgartner S.
        • Bosk C.L.
        The rise and fall of social problems.
        Am J Sociol. 1988; 94: 53-78
        • Schroedel J.R.
        • Jordan D.R.
        Senate voting and social construction of target populations.
        J Health Pol Policy Law. 1998; 23: 107-132
        • Grogan C.M.
        The Medicaid managed care policy consensus for welfare recipients.
        J Health Pol Policy Law. 1997; 22: 815-838
        • Schneider A.
        • Ingram H.
        Social construction of target populations.
        Am Pol Sci Rev. 1993; 87: 334-347
        • Weisman C.S.
        Women’s health care: activist traditions and institutional change. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD1998
        • Baird K.L.
        Gender justice and the health care system. Garland Publishing, New York1998
        • Weisman C.S.
        Breast cancer policymaking.
        in: Kasper A.S. Fegurson S.J. Breast cancer: the social construction of an illness. St. Martin’s Press, New York2000
        • Kingdon J.W.
        Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York1995
        • Oliver T.R.
        • Paul-Shaheen P.
        State government and health insurance market reform.
        in: Leitcher H.M. Health policy reform in America: innovations from the states, 2nd ed. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY1997
        • Peterson M.A.
        Political influence in the 1990s.
        J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993; 18: 395-438
        • Weiss R.S.
        Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. The Free Press, New York1994
        • Weber R.P.
        Basic content analysis. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA1990
        • Kripendorff K.
        Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA1980
        • Lantz P.M.
        • Sever L.E.
        Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies for providing follow-up and treatment services in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program—United States, 1997.
        Morbid Mortal Weekly Rep. 1998; 47: 215-218
        • Lantz P.M.
        • Richardson L.C.
        • Sever L.E.
        • et al.
        Mass screening in low-income populations.
        J Health Pol Policy Law. 2000; 25: 451-471
        • Mann J.M.
        • Melnick G.
        • Bamezai A.
        • Zwanziger J.
        Uncompensated care.
        Health Affairs. 1995; 14: 263-270
        • Cunningham P.J.
        • Grossman J.M.
        • St. Peter R.F.
        • Lesser C.S.
        Managed care and physicians’ provision of charity care.
        JAMA. 1999; 281: 1087-1092
        • Wilson J.M.G.
        • Junger G.
        The principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health Papers, 34. World Health Organization, Geneva1968: 26-39
        • Shickle D.
        • Chadwick R.
        The ethics of screening.
        J Med Ethics. 1994; 20: 12-18
        • Miller A.B.
        The ethics, the risks and the benefits of screening.
        Biomed Pharmacother. 1988; 42: 439-442
        • Kahn J.G.
        • Haile B.
        • Kates J.
        • Chang S.
        Health and federal budgetary effects of increasing access to antiretroviral medications for HIV by expanding Medicaid.
        Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 1464-1473
      3. National Conference on State Legislatures website, http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/cancerch.htm)