Women's Health Issues
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 70-78, January 2009

Financial and Quality-of-Life Burden of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding Among Women Agreeing To Obtain Surgical Treatment

  • Kevin D. Frick, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Kevin D. Frick, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Rm. 606, Baltimore MD 21205. Phone: 410-614-4018; Fax: 410-955-0470.
  • ,
  • Melissa A. Clark, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Brown University, School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
  • ,
  • Donald M. Steinwachs, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Patricia Langenberg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • Dale Stovall, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia
  • ,
  • Malcolm G. Munro, MD

      Affiliations

    • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angles, California
  • ,
  • Kay Dickersin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  • ,
  • The STOP-DUB Research Group

Received 6 March 2008; received in revised form 27 June 2008; accepted 16 July 2008.

Purpose

In this study, we sought to 1) describe elements of the financial and quality-of-life burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) from the perspective of women who agreed to obtain surgical treatment; 2) explore associations between DUB symptom characteristics and the financial and quality-of-life burden; 3) estimate the annual dollar value of the financial burden; and 4) estimate the most that could be spent on surgery to eliminate DUB symptoms for which medical treatment has been unsuccessful that would result in a $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Methods

We collected baseline data on DUB symptoms and aspects of the financial and quality-of-life burden for 237 women agreeing to surgery for DUB in a randomized trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation. Measures included out-of-pocket pharmaceutical expenditures, excess expenditures on pads or tampons, the value of time missed from paid work and home management activities, and health utility. We used χ2 and t tests to assess the statistical significance of associations between DUB characteristics and the financial and quality-of-life burden. The annual financial burden was estimated.

Results

Pelvic pain and cramps were associated with activity limitations and tiredness was associated with a lower health utility. Excess pharmaceutical and pad and tampon costs were $333 per patient per year (95% confidence interval [CI], $263–$403). Excess paid work and home management loss costs were $2,291 per patient per year (95% CI, $1847–$2752). Effective surgical treatment costing $40,000 would be cost-effective compared with unsuccessful medical treatment.

Conclusion

The financial and quality-of-life effects of DUB represent a substantial burden.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by Grant #5U01 HS09506 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to the University of Maryland (1996 to 1998) and Brown Medical School (1998–2001), and grant #5U01 HS09506 and #5HS09506a to Brown University (2001–2005).

 Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00114088.

PII: S1049-3867(08)00098-4

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.002

Women's Health Issues
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 70-78, January 2009