Women's Health Issues
Volume 18, Issue 5 , Pages 360-368, September 2008

Who is Using Emergency Contraception?

Awareness and Use of Emergency Contraception Among California Women and Teens

  • Susie B. Baldwin, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Office of Health Assessment and Epidemiology, Los Angeles County Department of Pubic Health, Los Angeles, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Susie Baldwin, MD, MPH, Chief, Office of Health Assessment and Epidemiology, 313 North Figueroa Street, Room 127, Los Angeles, CA 90012
  • ,
  • Rosa Solorio, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Department of Health Services, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Donna L. Washington, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
    • David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Hongjian Yu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of California Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Yii-Chieh Huang, MS

      Affiliations

    • University of California Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • E. Richard Brown, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of California Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California

Received 1 December 2007; received in revised form 28 June 2008; accepted 30 June 2008.

Introduction

Emergency contraception (EC) reduces women's risk for pregnancy after unprotected intercourse, and women's awareness of the method is increasingly important for expanding access. However, knowledge of EC alone does not predict use, and few population data exist to describe EC use among those aware of the method.

Methods

Using data from the 2003 California Health Interview Survey, we measured EC awareness among 11,392 women ages 15–44, and EC use among 7,178 respondents who were aware of EC and at risk for pregnancy. Using χ2 analyses and multivariable logistic regression, we examined population characteristics that epidemiologically predict EC awareness and use, including age, race/ethnicity, income, health insurance status, usual source of health care, immigration status, languages spoken at home, and urban versus rural residence.

Results

Nearly 76% of respondents had heard of EC, but awareness was lower among teens, women of color, poor women, women with publicly funded health insurance, those without a usual source of care, immigrants, non–English-language speakers, and rural residents. Among women aware of EC, about 4% reported having used the method in the previous year; young age, low income, attending a community/government clinic for care or not having a source of care, and living in an urban area significantly increased the odds for using EC.

Conclusions

Among California women in 2003, awareness and use of EC remained low. However, similar rates of use were reported among racial, ethnic, and linguistic subgroups. Those most likely to report use of the method included population groups at high risk for unintended pregnancy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by funds from the California Program on Access to Care (CPAC), California Policy Research Center, University of California, Grant Number DNN02K. The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily represent those of the Regents of the University of California, CPAC, its advisory board, or any State or County executive agency represented thereon.

PII: S1049-3867(08)00095-9

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2008.06.005

Women's Health Issues
Volume 18, Issue 5 , Pages 360-368, September 2008