Women's Health Issues
Volume 18, Issue 5 , Pages 351-359, September 2008

Family Planning and Life Planning:

Reproductive Intentions Among Individuals Seeking Reproductive Health Care

Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Received 3 December 2007; accepted 27 February 2008. published online 16 May 2008.

Background

Little research has focused on men and women's reproductive intentions before pregnancy and their perceived personal and social motivations to prevent an unintended pregnancy.

Methods

To assess the reproductive intentions of low-income men and women in California, we asked individuals seeking reproductive health services about their plans for childbearing, including an ideal timeframe and perceived advantages of delay. We also asked about their health care visit to examine how contraceptive use and services relate to reproductive intentions.

Results

The majority (77%) of the 1,409 reproductive health clients surveyed wanted to have a/another child, but hoped to delay childbearing by an average of 5.4 years. The most common reasons for wanting to delay pregnancy were related to finances (24%) or education (19%), with differences by race/ethnicity and gender. We did not observe a clear relationship between the length of time the client wanted to delay pregnancy and the type of contraceptive method dispensed during the clinic visit.

Conclusions

Individuals seeking reproductive health care perceive many personal benefits to planning and timing their pregnancies, and most will need many years of contraceptive protection to achieve their reproductive goals. Providers should work with their patients to ensure that they receive a contraceptive method that is consistent with the length of pregnancy prevention they desire.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by contract #05-45122 from the State of California, Department of Public Health, Office of Family Planning. All analyses, interpretations, or conclusions reached are those of UCSF, not the State of California.

PII: S1049-3867(08)00034-0

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.009

Women's Health Issues
Volume 18, Issue 5 , Pages 351-359, September 2008