Women's Health Issues
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 85-99, March 2008

Women’s Compliance with Public Health Guidelines for Mammograms and Pap tests in Canada and the United States:

An Analysis of Data from the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health

  • Debra L. Blackwell, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Debra L. Blackwell, PhD, is a statistician/demographer at the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in Hyattsville, Maryland. She works extensively on the National Health Interview Survey, particularly on family structure, demographic indicators, and health status and limitations.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Debra Blackwell, NCHS/DHIS, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2326, Hyattsville, MD, 20782.
  • ,
  • Michael E. Martinez, MPH, MHSA

      Affiliations

    • Michael E. Martinez, MPH, MHSA, is an epidemiologist at NCHS. His areas of interest include health insurance coverage status and Latino health issues.
  • ,
  • Jane F. Gentleman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Jane F. Gentleman, PhD, has been Director of the NCHS Division of Health Interview Statistics since 1999. Prior to that, she was at Statistics Canada, and before that, she was a faculty member at the University of Waterloo in Canada. Her current research interests are in survey methodology and data analysis.

National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health Interview Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland

Received 4 May 2007; accepted 23 October 2007. published online 07 January 2008.

Objectives

We use the Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health (JCUSH) to examine use of mammograms and Pap tests among Canadian and US women during 2002 and 2003. Unlike previous data, the JCUSH data are bi-nationally comparable, in that the same instrument was used for interviewing both Canadian and US respondents at the same time. Furthermore, when appropriately weighted, these data are representative of the populations of both countries.

Methods

Descriptive statistics were used to provide a basic profile of screening practices among women in Canada and the United States. Logistic regression was then used to examine the determinants of compliance with mammogram and Pap test guidelines in the 2 countries, statistically controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health status, and other indicators suggested from previous research. To increase comparability, these analyses were restricted to the age ranges covered in common by the screening guidelines of both countries.

Results

Among women covered by the guidelines in both countries, screening rates were higher in the United States than in Canada at all ages, which is puzzling given the existence of Canada’s universal health care system. Multivariate analyses revealed that whether a woman had had a mammogram within the last 2 years (when predicting last Pap test) or had had a Pap test within the last 3 years (when predicting last mammogram) were the strongest and most consistent predictors of compliance in both countries. Race/ethnicity, nativity, marital status, socioeconomic status, insurance coverage in the United States, and various health status indicators also predicted compliance in some, but not all, models.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

PII: S1049-3867(07)00175-2

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2007.10.006

Women's Health Issues
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 85-99, March 2008