Women's Health Issues
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 227-236, July 2007

Health Interventions With Girls in the Juvenile Justice System

  • Patricia J. Kelly, PhD, MPH, RN, FNP

      Affiliations

    • University of Missouri—Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Patricia J. Kelly, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Nursing and Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2220 Holmes, Kansas City, MO 64197-2639; Phone: 816-235-2617.
  • ,
  • Steven V. Owen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • ,
  • Esther Peralez-Dieckmann, MPA

      Affiliations

    • Office of Women’s Health Advocacy, Santa Clara County, California
  • ,
  • Elisabeth Martinez, MS

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Received 4 August 2006; received in revised form 23 February 2007; accepted 28 March 2007.

Purpose

Girls today make up 25% of youth in the juvenile justice system (JJS). To address the interrelated sexual and dating violence risk behaviors of this population, we compared the relative impact of a 6-hour, peer-led group intervention, Girl Talk-2, whose goal was to decrease sexual and dating violence risk behaviors, with the impact of a comparison group in which the same information was presented in a standard lecture and video format.

Methods

A cyclic cohort study with alternating intervention and comparison programs were implemented with 539 girls at 6 sites of a county JJS. Data were collected on relevant knowledge, attitudes and practices pre-intervention, immediately postintervention, and 6 months postintervention.

Results

Although all participants had high rates of risky behaviors, knowledge and attitudes about sexual protective behaviors were worse as girls’ level of involvement in the JJS increased. At 6 month follow-up, the Girl Talk-2 intervention group had significantly higher use of condoms and communication skills to defuse potentially violent situations than girls in the comparison group. Both groups had improvement in knowledge and attitudes over time, and the intervention group reported higher use of newly acquired communication skills.

Conclusions

The Girl Talk-2 intervention showed significant changes in 2 out of 3 key protective behaviors for participants when compared with a comparison group. Effective behavioral interventions are essential to assist girls in the JJS safeguard their future health.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1049-3867(07)00057-6

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2007.03.005

Women's Health Issues
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 227-236, July 2007