Women's Health Issues
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 217-226, July 2007

A National Overview of Reproductive Health Care Services for Girls in Juvenile Justice Residential Facilities

  • Catherine A. Gallagher, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Justice, Law and Crime Policy Program, Department of Public and International Affairs, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia
    • The Lloyd Society, Kensington, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Catherine A Gallagher, PhD, Justice, Law and Crime Policy Program, Department of Public and International Affairs, MSN 4F4, 10900 University Drive, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110.
  • ,
  • Adam Dobrin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, Florida
    • The Lloyd Society, Kensington, Maryland
  • ,
  • Anne S. Douds, JD

      Affiliations

    • Justice, Law and Crime Policy Program, Department of Public and International Affairs, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia
    • The Lloyd Society, Kensington, Maryland

Received 15 May 2006; received in revised form 3 January 2007; accepted 29 January 2007.

Purpose/Research Questions

Adolescent girls involved in the juvenile justice system face a substantially higher risk for a host of reproductive health problems. This study is the first national overview of the extent to which Juvenile Justice Residential Facilities (JJRFs) are meeting their reproductive health needs. The primary focus is whether all girls/young women receive gynecologic services.

Methods

Data are from the 2004 Juvenile Residential Facility Census, an ongoing national institution-level data collection. Respondents include facility administrators and facility health care providers. Mixed-gender and girls-only facilities are included in these analyses (n = 1,255).

Main Findings

Full population testing for pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases occurs in <18% of all facilities. Although about 25% of all JJRFs report housing ≥1 pregnant teens, an equal number offers no obstetric services. Most JJRFs (about 85%) report that only some girls receive care from a gynecologist, largely “as necessary” and based on self-reports of sexual activity or suspected pregnancy. Provision of gynecologic services to all girls/young women is significantly more likely in all-female, state-owned, large population, and longer stay facilities and less likely in short stay, mixed-gender, crowded, and locally and privately owned facilities.

Conclusions

Results indicate that most facilities can garner a few necessary services. However, contrary to recommendations of national organizations, the services tend to be provided in an ad hoc manner rather than to the full population of young women. Results of multivariate models predicting facility types most likely to provide full population services should be useful as leaders in the area retarget their recommendations to address this gap in services.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and by The Lloyd Society.

PII: S1049-3867(07)00031-X

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2007.02.006

Women's Health Issues
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 217-226, July 2007