Women's Health Issues
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29, January 2006

Ensuring high-quality primary care for women: Predictors of success

  • Bevanne A. Bean-Mayberry, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    • Center for Research on Health Care, Division of General Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: B.A. Bean-Mayberry, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive C (151-C), Pittsburgh, PA 15240
  • ,
  • Chung-Chou H. Chang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Research on Health Care, Division of General Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  • ,
  • Melissa A. McNeil, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    • Center for Research on Health Care, Division of General Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  • ,
  • Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    • Research and Analysis, National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC, USA

Received 11 November 2003; received in revised form 12 October 2004; accepted 10 December 2004.

Background

Provider gender, provider specialty, and clinic setting affect quality of primary care delivery for women, but previous research has not examined these factors in combination. The purpose of this study is to determine whether separate or combined effects of provider gender, availability of gynecologic services from the provider, and women’s clinic setting improve patient ratings of primary care.

Methods

Women veterans receiving care in women’s clinics or traditional primary care at 10 Veteran’s Affair (VA) medical centers completed a mailed questionnaire (N = 1321, 61%) rating four validated domains of primary care (preference for provider, communication, coordination, and accumulated knowledge). For each domain, summary scores were calculated and dichotomized into perfect score (maximum score) versus other. Multiple logistic regressions were used to estimate the probability of a perfect score in each domain while controlling for patient characteristics and site.

Results

Female provider was significantly associated with perfect ratings for communication and coordination. Providing gynecologic care was significantly associated with perfect ratings for male and female providers. Patients who used a women’s clinic and had a female provider who gave gynecologic care had perfect or nearly perfect ratings for preference for provider, communication, and accumulated knowledge.

Conclusion

Gynecologic services are linked to patient ratings of primary care separate from and in synergy with the effect of female provider. Male and female providers should consider offering routine gynecologic services or working in coordination with a setting that provides gynecologic services. Health care evaluations should assess scope of services for provider and practice.

Keywords:  Women , Veterans , Gynecology , Primary care Quality , Quality of care

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Bean-Mayberry’s project was funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veteran’s Integrated Service Network 4, Competitive Pilot Project Funds in 2000. Dr. Scholle is supported in part by the National Center of Excellence in Women’s Health at Magee-Womens Hospital.

PII: S1049-3867(05)00110-6

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2005.12.002

Women's Health Issues
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29, January 2006