Women's Health Issues
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 4-13, January 2006

Patient costs for medication abortion: Results from a study of five clinical practices

  • Stephanie L. Van Bebber, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program, Center for Reproductive Health Research & Policy, San Francisco, California
    • Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • ,
  • Kathryn A. Phillips, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program, Center for Reproductive Health Research & Policy, San Francisco, California
    • Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Kathryn A. Phillips, PhD, Professor of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St. Suite 415, Box 0613, San Francisco, CA 94143
  • ,
  • Tracy A. Weitz, MPA

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program, Center for Reproductive Health Research & Policy, San Francisco, California
  • ,
  • Heather Gould, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program, Center for Reproductive Health Research & Policy, San Francisco, California
  • ,
  • Felicia Stewart, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Received 8 April 2005; received in revised form 14 June 2005; accepted 8 July 2005.

Purpose

In 2000, the FDA approved mifepristone as a medication abortion alternative. There is limited understanding of the patient costs associated with use of this method. Our objective was to determine total patient costs for medication abortion. This information may be useful for improving counseling and patient decision making.

Methods

We surveyed 212 women who received a medication abortion from a convenience sample of 5 health care practices. Patient costs including direct medical costs (pregnancy test costs, charges), direct nonmedical costs (child care, travel, lodging), and productivity losses (value of time away from work or other activities) were determined.

Results

The mean total cost for medication abortion was $351 ($0–1,140). The average charge paid by women themselves for the procedure itself was $306. Three quarters of total costs were direct medical costs and almost one quarter was time away from work and other activities. Although nearly three quarters of the women were insured, only 1% used insurance to cover their abortion—many (44%) did not know if their insurance covered abortion.

Conclusions

This study provides descriptive information on patient costs associated with medication abortion that may be integrated into patient counseling to enhance informed decision making by women. The study raises questions about why women who report having insurance are not aware of whether their insurance will cover abortion and suggests that we are unclear about women’s and providers’ preferences for using insurance. We should continue to develop our knowledge of the clinical and nonclinical trade-offs for women choosing between abortion methods to benefit patient decision making.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Open Society Institute.

PII: S1049-3867(05)00081-2

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2005.07.006

Women's Health Issues
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 4-13, January 2006