Women's Health Issues
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 44-55, March 2006

Gender differences across racial and ethnic groups in the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure associated with comorbidities

  • Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo, MD, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo, MD, MSc, PhD, Director, Women’s Health and Gender-Based Research, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; Phone: 301-427-1550; Fax: 301-427-1562.
  • ,
  • Beth Stevens, MS

      Affiliations

    • Colorado Foundation for Medical Care, Englewood, Colorado
  • ,
  • Ernest Moy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland
  • ,
  • David Nilasena, MD

      Affiliations

    • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
  • ,
  • Francis Chesley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland
  • ,
  • Kelly McDermott, MA

      Affiliations

    • Medstat Group, Inc.

Received 4 October 2004; received in revised form 24 February 2005; accepted 18 April 2005.

This paper provides important insights on gender differences across racial and ethnic groups in a Medicare population in terms of the quality of care received for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and congestive heart failure (CHF) in association with diabetes or hypertension/end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Both race/ethnicity and gender are associated with differences in the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of Medicare recipients with these conditions. In the AMI group, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients of both genders were less likely to receive aspirin or β-blockers than non-Hispanic Whites. These differences persisted for Hispanic women and men even when they presented with ESRD or diabetes. Rates for smoking cessation counseling were among the lowest among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics with AMI–diabetes and non-Hispanic blacks with AMI–hypertension/ESRD. Gender comparisons within racial groups for the AMI and AMI–diabetes groups show that among non-Hispanic Whites, women were less likely to receive aspirin and β-blockers. No gender differences were noted among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Medicare recipients. In the CHF group, Hispanics were the racial/ethnic group least likely to have an assessment of left ventricular function (LVF), even if they had diabetes and had lower rates of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy or even if they had combined CHF–hypertension/ESRD. Gender comparisons in both the CHF and CHF–hypertension/ESRD groups show that non-Hispanic White women were less likely to have an LVF assessment than non-Hispanic White men. Among all subjects, having comorbidities with AMI was not associated with higher markers of quality cardiovascular care. Closing the many gaps in cardiovascular care must target the specific needs of women and men across racial and ethnic groups.

Keywords:  acute myocardial infarction , heart disease , coronary heart disease , heart failure , congestive heart failure , health care quality , disparities in health care , gender-based research , women’s health , men’s health , older adults , aged , elderly

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the Federal government.

PII: S1049-3867(05)00061-7

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2005.04.003

Women's Health Issues
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 44-55, March 2006