Women's Health Issues
Volume 15, Issue 6 , Pages 258-264, November 2005

Loss-framed minimal intervention increases mammography use

  • Doris A. Abood, EdD, CHES

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition, Food, and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding to: Doris Abood, EdD, CHES, Department of Nutrition, Food, and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Department of Nutrition, Food, & Exercise Sciences, 408 Sandels Building, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1493; Phone: 850-644-4796; Fax: 850-645-5000.
  • ,
  • David R. Black, PhD, MPH, CHES

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
  • ,
  • Daniel C. Coster, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, Utah

Introduction

Although mammography is the most effective early detection breast cancer screening technology available, it is underutilized. This study was conducted to test the effectiveness of a loss-framed minimal intervention to increase mammography use. Loss-frame refers to a communication strategy in which messages are framed from the perspective of what a person has to lose by not taking a particular behavioral action.

Methods

Participants were medically un- and underinsured women 50–64 years old who called one of two urban clinics randomly selected based on demographic statistical equivalency. The women who participated telephoned to inquire about a mammogram during the 6-month study period. The group randomly designated as the experimental group received a loss-framed message conveyed by trained staff telephonically. Members of the comparison group received the “usual” communication, also conveyed telephonically. In the experimental group, 31 of 112 (27%) women who inquired received mammograms, whereas 157 of the 992 (16%) comparison group women who inquired received mammograms.

Results

The odds of a mammogram, adjusted for race and breast cancer symptoms, significantly increased for the experimental (odds ratio [OR] = 1.914, χ2 = 7.48, p = .0063, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20–3.05) versus comparison group.

Conclusions

A loss-framed, in-reach, minimal intervention approach holds promise as a mammography promotion strategy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1049-3867(05)00060-5

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2005.07.005

Women's Health Issues
Volume 15, Issue 6 , Pages 258-264, November 2005