Women's Health Issues
Volume 15, Issue 3 , Pages 117-125, May 2005

Threats to family planning services in Michigan: Organizational responses to economic and political challenges

  • Vanessa K. Dalton, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Vanessa K. Dalton, MD, MPH, University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., L4000 Women’s Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
  • ,
  • Peter D. Jacobson, JD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Julie Berson-Grand, MPH

      Affiliations

    • University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Carol S. Weisman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Received 19 April 2004; received in revised form 28 August 2004; accepted 18 November 2004.

Title X is the only federal funding specifically for contraception and family planning services. This study identifies the threats and challenges Title X family planning organizations face in Michigan, and examines organizational responses to these challenges. We hypothesized that organizational responses to current challenges, including recent legislation, would differ between organizational types. We used a multiple case study design to examine safety net providers that received Title X funding in 2001. Cases were selected to represent economic and geographic diversity and included a mix of population densities. Key informants at each organization participated in face-to-face, semistructured interviews. Interviews collected data on current challenges, organizational planning processes, and organizational responses. All Title X organizations reported significant challenges, including rising costs, increasing need, and inadequate funding. Private organizations were more concerned about political challenges, especially recent Michigan legislation, than health departments. Organizational type was associated with the type of response. Health departments tended to close clinics or cut services, whereas private organizations recruited insured populations and increased patient fees. Based on these findings, the family planning safety net in Michigan appears to be undergoing significant change. These changes may decrease the availability of affordable family planning services in Michigan.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1049-3867(05)00006-X

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2004.11.007

Women's Health Issues
Volume 15, Issue 3 , Pages 117-125, May 2005