Women's Health Issues
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 130-139, July 2004

The role of physician gender in the evaluation of the National Centers of Excellence in Women’s Health: Test of an alternate hypothesis

  • Jillian T. Henderson, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Jillian T. Henderson, PhD, MPH, Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, California 94118 USA Phone: 415-502-8544
  • ,
  • Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC, USA
  • ,
  • Carol S. Weisman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
  • ,
  • Roger T. Anderson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA

Received 9 March 2004; received in revised form 14 April 2004; accepted 21 April 2004.

Abstract 

A 2002 evaluation of the National Centers of Excellence in Women’s Health (CoE) provided evidence that women receive higher-quality primary health care, as indicated by receipt of recommended preventive care and patient satisfaction, when they receive their care in comprehensive women’s health centers. A potential rival explanation for the CoE evaluation findings, however, is that the higher quality of care in the CoE may be attributable to a predominance of female physicians in CoE settings. More women who receive health care in a CoE have a female regular physician and female physicians may provide more preventive health services. Additionally, women may self-select into the CoE because of their preference for female providers. This paper presents results of an analysis examining the role of physician gender in the CoE evaluation. Women seen in three CoE clinics and women seen in other settings in the same communities who had a female physician are compared to assess the CoE effect while controlled for physician gender. The findings confirm a positive CoE effect for many of the quality of care indicators that were observed in the original evaluation. Women seen in CoEs are more likely to receive physical breast examinations and mammograms (ages ≥50). In addition, positive CoE findings for counseling on domestic violence, sexually transmitted diseases, family or relationship concerns, and sexual function or concerns were upheld. The CoE model of care delivers advantages to women that are not explained by the greater number of female physicians in these settings.

Keywords:  physician gender, women’s health care, primary care, prevention

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1049-3867(04)00038-6

doi:10.1016/j.whi.2004.04.005

Women's Health Issues
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 130-139, July 2004