Women's Health Issues
Volume 13, Issue 6 , Pages 214-221 , November 2003

Presentation, delay, and contraindication to thrombolytic treatment in females and males with myocardial infarction

  • Sherry L. Grace, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University Health Network Women's Health Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Sherry L. Grace, PhD, University Health Network Women's Health Program, ML2-004c, 657 University Avenue, Toronto ON, M5G 2N2 Canada; Phone: 416-340-4800 x. 6455; Fax: 416-340-4185
  • ,
  • Susan E. Abbey, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • University Health Network, Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto, Director, Program in Medical Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Susan Bisaillon, RN, MScN

      Affiliations

    • Trillium Health Centre, Mississauga, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Zachary M. Shnek, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Credit Valley Hospital, Department of Psychology and University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Jane Irvine, PhD

      Affiliations

    • York University, Department of Psychology and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Donna E. Stewart, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • University Health Network Women's Health Program and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 14 April 2003 ,Revised 15 July 2003 ,Accepted 2 September 2003.

References 

  1. Alter DA, Naylor CD, Austin P, Tu JV. Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;341:1359–1367
  2. Barakat K, Wilkinson P, Suliman A, Ranjadayalan K, Timmis A. Acute myocardial infarction in women: Contribution of treatment variables to adverse outcome. American Heart Journal. 2000;140:740–746
  3. Barron HV, Bowlby LF, Breen T. Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the united states: Data from the national registry of myocardial infarction 2. Circulation. 1998;97:1150–1156
  4. Bell DB, Nappi J. Myocardial infarction in women: A critical appraisal of gender differences in outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 2000;20:1034–1044
  5. Cundiff, D. K. (2002). Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: Drug review. Medscape General Medicine. Available: www.medscape.com/viewarticle/414942
  6. Dracup K, Moser DK, Eisenberg M, Meischke H, Alonzo AA, Braslow A. Causes of delay in seeking treatment for heart attack symptoms. Social Science & Medicine. 1995;40:379–392
  7. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group . Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction (Collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomized trials of more than 1000 patients). Lancet. 1997;343:311–322
  8. Finnegan JR, Meischke H, Zapka JG, Leviton LC, Meshack A, Benjamin-Barner R, et al.  Patient delay in seeking care for heart attack symptoms: Findings from focus groups conducted in five U.S. regions. Preventive Medicine: An International Devoted to Practice & Theory. 2000;31:205–213
  9. Hochman JS, McCabe CH, Stone PH, Becker RC, Cannon CP, DeFeo-Fraulini T, et al.  Outcome and profile of women and men presenting with acute coronary syndromes: A report from TIMI IIIB. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997;30:141–148
  10. Horne R, James D, Petrie KJ, Weinman J, Vincent R. Patients' interpretation of symptoms as a cause of delay in reaching hospital during acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2000;84:388–393
  11. ISIS-3 . A randomised comparison of streptokinase vs. tissue plasminogen activator vs. alteplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs. aspirin along among 41,299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1992;393:753–770
  12. Kaplan, K., Fitzpatrick, P., Cox, C., Shammas, N., & Marder, V. J. Use of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Effects of gender and age on treatment rates. Journal of Thrombosis & Thrombolysis, 13, 21–26
  13. Killip T, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: A two year experience with 250 patients. American Journal of Cardiology. 1967;20:457–464
  14. Kudenchuk P, Maynard C, Martin J, Wirkus M, Weaver WD. Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in males versus females. American Journal of Cardiology. 1996;78:9–14
  15. Malacrida R, Genoni M, Peitro Mannioni A, Spataro V, Parish S, Palmer A, et al.  A comparison of the early outcome of acute myocardial infarction in women and men. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338:8–14
  16. Maynard C, Althouse R, Olsufka M, Ritchie JL, Davis KB, Kennedy JW. Early versus late hospital arrival for acute myocardial infarction in the Western Washington thrombolytic therapy trials. American Journal of Cardiology. 1989;63:1296–1300
  17. Miller CL. Cue sensitivity in women with cardiac disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing. 2000;15:82–89
  18. Milner KA, Funk M, Richards S, Wilmes RM, Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM. Gender differences in symptom presentation associated with coronary heart disease. American Journal of Cardiology. 1999;84:396–399
  19. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Braniff BA, Brooks NH, Califf RM, et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1996;28:1328–1428
  20. Spencer F, Scleparis G, Goldberg RJ, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Gore JM. Decade-long trends (1986 to 1997) in the medical treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A community-wide perspective. American Heart Journal. 2001;142:594–603
  21. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers; 2001;
  22. van Tiel D, van Vliet KP, Moerman CJ. Sex differences in illness beliefs and illness behaviour in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Patient Education & Counseling. 1998;33:143–147
  23. Weaver WD, White HD, Wilcox RG, Aylward PE, Morris D, Guerci A, et al.  Comparisons of characteristics and outcomes among women and men with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996;275:777–782
  24. Weitzman S, Cooper L, Chambless L, Rosamond W, Clegg L, Marcucci G, et al.  Gender, racial, and geographic differences in the performance of cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for hospitalized acute myocardial infarction in four states. American Journal of Cardiology. 1971;79:722–726
  25. Woodfield SL, Lundergan CF, Reiner JS, Thompson MA, Rohrbeck SC, Deychack Y, et al.  Gender and acute myocardial infarction: Is there a different response to thrombolysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997;29:35–42

PII: S1049-3867(03)00074-4

doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2003.09.002

Women's Health Issues
Volume 13, Issue 6 , Pages 214-221 , November 2003