2020 Vision for A High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System
Article Outline
- Abstract
- Introduction
- 2020 Vision Methodology
- Values and Principles for a High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System
- Care Levels A and B: Women and Their Support Networks, and the Microsystems That Provide Direct Care
- Key Participants
- Care Settings
- Care Levels C and D: Health Care Organizations and the Macro Environment
- References
- Biography
- Copyright
A concrete and useful way to create an action plan for improving the quality of maternity care in the United States is to start with a view of the desired result, a common definition and a shared vision for a high-quality, high-value maternity care system. In this paper, we present a long-term vision for the future of maternity care in the United States. We present overarching values and principles and specific attributes of a high-performing maternity care system. We put forth the “2020 Vision for a High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System” to serve as a positive starting place for a fruitful collaborative process to develop specific action steps for broad-based maternity care system improvement.
Introduction
A concrete and useful way to create an action plan for improving the quality of maternity care in the United States is to start with a view of the desired result, a common definition and a shared vision for a high-quality, high-value maternity care system. In this paper, we present a long-term vision for the future of maternity care in the United States. We present overarching values and principles and specific attributes of a high-performing maternity care system. We put forth the “2020 Vision for a High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System” to serve as a positive starting place for a fruitful collaborative process to develop specific action steps for broad-based maternity care system improvement.
In preparation for Childbirth Connection's Transforming Maternity Care symposium, this vision paper was provided to the members of five stakeholder workgroups, who were asked to develop sector-specific recommendations for moving toward the ideal model it describes (summaries of the stakeholder reports appear in the Symposium Proceedings included in the current special supplement issue; the full reports are available online at www.childbirthconnection.org/workgroups). These five stakeholder reports form the basis for a comprehensive “Blueprint for Action” that also appears in this issue.
2020 Vision Methodology
In April, 2008, Childbirth Connection convened a “Vision Team” of innovators in maternity care delivery and health systems design from diverse backgrounds to develop a definitional framework of fundamental values, principles, and goals for a high-quality, high-value maternity care system that could serve as a focal point to inspire improvement strategies. To benefit from of a broad range of expert perspectives and ensure the representation of essential viewpoints, we assembled contributors to this vision with a wide array of disciplinary expertise that includes childbirth education, community/public health consumer advocacy, employer perspectives, family medicine, general obstetrics and gynecology, health economics, health policy, health system administration, labor support, maternal-fetal medicine, maternity nursing, nurse-midwifery, and quality and measurement research in health care.
The team came together for a 1-day, intensive, creative planning conference held in San Francisco in April 2008. A skilled professional facilitator with extensive experience in strategic visioning for health care helped guide the proceedings. This meeting generated a rich graphic report and taped transcripts, which were refined into the Vision Paper through a process of group input and discussion via telephone and e-mail over a period of months. The final paper was peer reviewed by the Symposium Steering Committee and all Stakeholder Workgroup Chairs.
The “2020 Vision for a High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System” reflects the collaborative work and consensus viewpoints of the Vision Team. Consensus was defined as general agreement although not necessarily unanimity among team members, and was reached through a process of discussion to resolve individual concerns to the satisfaction of all participants.
Before the Vision Team meeting, all participants received pre-publication copies of “Evidence-Based Maternity Care: What It Is and What It Can Achieve” (Sakala & Corry, 2008), as well as Donald Berwick's Health Affairs article, “A User's Manual for the IOM's ‘Quality Chasm’ Report” (2002) and the “Sicily Statement on Evidence-based Practice” (Dawes et al., 2005). The latter provides a standard definition of evidence-based practice and the core critical appraisal skills and education necessary for health care providers.
The Vision Team also received a compendium of systematic reviews and better quality evidence of the effectiveness of different core elements of the maternity care system. This compendium was derived from the body of Childbirth Connection's work over the past decade to compile and disseminate systematic reviews on the effectiveness of all aspects of maternity care, through its online evidence-based maternity care resource directory and quarterly evidence columns published simultaneously in two peer-reviewed clinical care journals. The compendium provided to the Vision Team was composed of systematic reviews published through April 2008, focused on elements of the structure and organization of maternity care, which included various models for provision of maternity care, cadres of professionals who care for childbearing families, and settings where maternity care is provided, including the physical environment. On core topics for which no recent systematic review was available, high-quality substitutes were provided and noted as such. A bibliography of these sources is posted online at www.childbirthconnection.org/vision. These background resources were used to provide a general framework grounded in evidence-based maternity care to serve as a foundation for the ensuing vision.
The team worked together to generate a vision for the highest quality and value maternity care system under the assumption of no constraints. Consistent with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) definition, quality is defined as the degree to which maternity care services provided to individuals and populations increase the likelihood of optimal health outcomes and are consistent with current knowledge (IOM, 2001). Value is defined as the optimal cost to quality ratio in the delivery of maternity care services. In contrast, consideration of values and principles takes account of moral, ethical, and cultural issues important to consumers and other stakeholders.
Vision Structure and Content
The team developed a statement of general values and principles that apply across the continuum of maternity care. These values and principles present maternity care-specific definitions to describe critical dimensions of quality and value, using and elaborating on the framework put forward in the IOM's landmark report, Crossing the Quality Chasm (2001).
In 2002, Donald Berwick published a “user's manual” for the Crossing the Quality Chasm report. In it, he described the framework that its authors used to plan, discuss, and propose health system change and redesign. The Vision Team used Berwick's paradigm of four levels of care (labeled A through D) to achieve granularity and specificity in looking at maternity care system change. When applied to maternity care, the four levels are: A) the experience of women, their families and support networks, B) the clinical microsystems that provide direct maternity care, C) the hospitals and health care organizations that house and support clinical microsystems, and D) the environment of policy, payment, regulation, accreditation, litigation, and other macro-level factors that influence the delivery of maternity care. The group generated goals for each level of care. Features of care that apply across the continuum of maternity care were incorporated into the Values and Principles, and features specific to a particular phase of care were incorporated into the summary of goals for that phase.
For Care Levels A and B (women and their support networks, and the microsystems that provide direct care), the Vision Team divided maternity care into three phases: 1) care during pregnancy, 2) care around the time of birth, and 3) care after birth. For each phase of care, the group considered: 1) the woman's experience of care, 2) the key features of care, 3) the key participants involved, and 4) the settings and locations of care.
In keeping with the definition adopted by the Symposium Steering Committee for the overall symposium, the team defined the scope of maternity care as follows: Care during pregnancy begins with confirmation of pregnancy and continues until the onset of labor. Care around the time of birth comprises the care that begins with labor and continues until mother and baby are stable at home. Care after birth is conceived as a continuum that includes all care delivered within the first 6 weeks of life of the newborn and extends forward across time, settings, and disciplines to anticipate and respond to continuing and new-onset mental, physical, and social needs of the mother, baby, and family.
The Transforming Maternity Care project does not address the pre- and interconceptional periods for two reasons. First, the focus on maternity care during pregnancy, around the time of birth, and in the initial period after birth is in itself a large, challenging scope of work. Second, although the importance of pre- and interconceptional health for childbearing is well recognized, the current scientific literature reveals very little high-level evidence about the positive impact of specific interventions during these periods on childbearing, as clarified by recent commentators (Atrash et al., 2008, Jack et al., 2008) and a new Cochrane review (Whitworth & Dowswell, 2009). In keeping with its direction-setting goal, the “2020 Vision” contextualizes maternity care within a coordinated, integrated system of life-span, family-oriented, preventive and supportive health care, and calls on the stakeholders to develop actionable strategies to ensure the integration of evidence-based interventions for the periods before and between pregnancy.
All Vision Team members agree on the fundamental values and principles expressed in the “2020 Vision for a High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System”; their application to maternity care practice and the delivery of maternity care services is beyond the scope of the Vision Team's work. With this paper, the Vision Team aims to provide both reasoned rationale and motivation to stakeholders and decision makers whom it calls on to implement the vision.
Values and Principles for a High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System
The IOM's landmark 2001 report, Crossing the Quality Chasm, called for a fundamental redesign of the U.S. health care system. The report provided a rational framework for improvement through six dimensions of care. In accordance with this framework, the mission of a maternity care system that delivers the highest quality and value is to achieve optimal health outcomes and experiences for mothers and babies through the consistent provision of woman-centered care grounded in the best available evidence of effectiveness with least risk of harm, and the best use of resources. Such care is provided in ways that are safe, effective, timely, efficient, and equitable for all women and their families. The ideal maternity care system protects, promotes, and supports physiologic childbirth, and optimal experiences for childbearing women based on shared decision making and respect for informed choice; provides care that is coordinated, evidence-based, and subject to ongoing performance measurement and quality disclosure; and promotes a work environment that is satisfying and fulfilling for its caregivers.
Six Aims Applied to Maternity Care
These aims serve as a foundation for our vision. The Vision Team elaborated on each of these aims to describe their distinctive features within the context of maternity care in the United States:
Woman-centered means that care respects the values, culture, choices, and preferences of the woman, and her family, as relevant, within the context of promoting optimal health outcomes. It means that all childbearing women are treated with kindness, respect, dignity, and cultural sensitivity, throughout their maternity care experiences.
Safe means that care is reliable, appropriate, and provided in systems that foster coordination, a culture of safety, and teamwork to produce the best outcomes for women and babies and minimize the risk of harm. Maternity care processes impact outcomes for both mothers and babies; safe care considers and balances the risks and benefits to both recipients, taking into account the health status of each.
Effective means that the care is based on sound evidence applied properly to the circumstances of the individual pregnant woman and her baby to achieve desired outcomes. Effective care minimizes overuse, underuse, and misuse of care practices and services and emphasizes care coordination to prevent duplication, omission, fragmentation, and error.
Timely means that care delivery is structured so that all care is delivered at the time that it is needed. In maternity care, this means that the timing of the onset and course of all stages of labor and the birth of the baby are determined by maternal–fetal physiology whenever possible, and not by time pressures exerted externally without clear medical indication. In the context of informed consent/refusal in maternity care, timely means that whenever possible discussions and information to facilitate women's decision making around the time of birth are available well in advance of the onset of labor and again as relevant during labor. Finally, unnecessary wait times do not compromise safety, system efficiency, cost effectiveness, and satisfaction with maternity care.
Efficient means that the maternity care system delivers the best possible health outcomes and benefits with the most appropriate, conservative use of resources and technology. Overuse and misuse of treatments and medical interventions are avoided because they waste resources and can result in preventable iatrogenic complications. Similarly, efficient maternity care captures the unrealized benefits from effective underutilized measures.
Equitable means that all women and families have access to and receive the same high-quality, high-value care. Any variation in maternity care practice is based solely on the health needs and values of each woman and her fetus/newborn, and not on other extrinsic, nonmedical factors. Furthermore, an equitable maternity care system addresses disparities in the baseline health status of women related to class, race, ethnicity, and language to ensure optimal maternity care outcomes and experiences for every woman and her children.
Further Foundational Values and Principles for Maternity Care
In addition, the following values and principles are foundational to our vision for a maternity care system of highest quality and value.
Life-changing experiencePregnancy, labor and birth, and the early postpartum and newborn period are important life-changing and memorable times in the lives of women and their families. Taken together, they represent a time of great opportunity to promote and improve health, because women and families often are greatly motivated to improve their lives at this time. The outcomes and experiences of childbearing have wide-ranging impact.
Care processes protect, promote, and support physiologic childbirthWomen and their fetuses/newborns share complex innate, mutually regulating, hormonally driven processes that constitute the biological foundation for childbearing. These physiologic neuroendocrine feedback mechanisms facilitate the period from the onset of labor through birth of the baby and placenta, as well as the establishment and continuation of breastfeeding and the development of mother–baby attachment. These processes confer physical, psychological, and social benefits. The complex hormonal orchestration of the process of parturition taken in its entirety constitutes physiologic childbirth.
Effective care with least harm is optimal for childbearing women and newborns. This entails conservative, preventive practices and support for physiologic childbearing for all women and babies without significant complications, for whom unnecessary intervention is likely to incur more harm than benefit. The majority of childbearing women are healthy and have good reason to expect an uncomplicated pregnancy and birth and a healthy newborn. Thus, practice variation for low-risk women is minimized under the principle that any intervention in the physiologic processes of pregnancy and childbirth must be shown to do more good than harm. Higher levels of care are only appropriate for those with a demonstrated need. Women and fetuses/newborns who experience complications, adverse situations, and unexpected outcomes require additional treatment and support tailored to their individual needs.
To this end, all providers of maternity care recognize, protect, promote, and support physiologic childbirth; respond appropriately to complications; and receive adequate training to do both. Protection of physiologic childbearing involves avoiding disruption and interference (e.g., unnecessary interventions, noise, personnel), promotion involves the health system (e.g., research, education, measurement, policies, values), and support involves skillful facilitation (e.g., comfort measures, encouragement, supportive care).
Care is evidence-basedMaternity care policy and practice evolve with the emergence of new research evidence and new ability to refine research methods. There is a focus on continuous critical appraisal of the existing research literature and investment in the ongoing study of the comparative effectiveness of a wide array of practices and approaches in maternity care, using a variety of validated methodologies in keeping with the mandate of the “Sicily Statement on Evidence-based Practice”, to continue to advance toward optimal care, defined as effective care with least harm, for all childbearing women and their fetuses/babies.
Quality is measured and performance is disclosedQuality measurement and disclosure through public reporting are essential features of a high-performing maternity care system. They are critically important to those who seek, provide, purchase, and pay for maternity care. System capacity is enhanced to evaluate and report the quality and outcomes of care at clinician, facility, health plan, and other levels. Both performance measurement and public reporting are inherent in the obligation to advance knowledge of the effects of care. A comprehensive set of nationally endorsed, evidence-based consensus standards to assess the quality of prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum services is in place to foster system-wide capacity for quality improvement, and these standards are regularly incorporated into care at all levels. Consumers have excellent support for understanding and using performance measures and other quality measures to make informed health care decisions. Health professionals and systems have ready access to reliable measures to support continuous quality improvement. Purchasers and payors have access to results of performance measurement to inform value-based purchasing decisions.
Care includes support for decision making and choiceHighest quality and value in maternity care are increased through seamless, effective coordination of care across settings and disciplines to maximize safety and efficiency and reduce waste. Care is coordinated to best meet the needs of mothers and their fetuses/newborns through effective teamwork, communication, coordinated management of care plans and provider responsibilities, medication reconciliation, and other shared information using electronic health records and interoperable data systems. There is particular attention to transitions of care, including from pregnancy to childbirth to postpartum care, and between settings or providers of care, to ensure consistent consideration of the woman's health history, values and wishes, plan of care, medications, and evolving needs.
Caregiver satisfaction and fulfillment is a core valueCaring for women, babies, and families during the critical time from pregnancy through the early postpartum period is both a great honor and a joy. To experience it as such, all caregivers in the maternity care system have a safe and respectful environment in which to practice, grow, and learn. This system welcomes and values caregiver contributions. It has and supports high standards of performance and respects the human needs and limits of providers. A just culture, grounded in a systems perspective and founded on appropriate assignment of accountability rather than individual blame, also protects caregivers from harm, and encourages continuous learning and professional development to maximize professional fulfillment and the ability to provide high-quality care.
Care Levels A and B: Women and Their Support Networks, and the Microsystems That Provide Direct Care
Applying Berwick's framework (2002) of four levels of care to the maternity care system, this section addresses key goals and principles for Care Levels A and B: women and their support networks, and the microsystems that provide direct care to them. It proposes a vision for the care experience of women and their support networks within a high-quality, high-value maternity care system, and describes the essential attributes and characteristics of the microsystem that reliably delivers such an experience.
Maternity care at Care Levels A and B is divided into three phases. The vision begins with a set of goal statements for each phase of maternity care—care during pregnancy, care around the time of birth, and care after birth—that describe the optimal experience of care from the perspective of the woman and her family and support network. This is followed by a description of the criteria for key participants and the principles that inform decisions about who takes part in providing high-quality, high-value care during each phase. Principal considerations concerning decisions about settings, locations, or the environment of care that are conducive to the realization of the vision goals in each phase are also described.
Care During Pregnancy: Summary of Goals
Care Around the Time of Birth: Summary of Goals
Care After Giving Birth: Summary of Goals
Key Participants
The goals for maternity care are best met by implementing a holistic, relationship-based model of care that is woman-centered, inclusive, and collaborative. Caregivers are included as dictated by the health needs, values, and preferences of each woman, taking into account her social and cultural context as she defines it, and given consideration for evidence of effectiveness, value, and efficiency.
In each phase, starting with Care During Pregnancy, maternity care is a team endeavor coordinated by a primary maternity care provider. Qualified primary providers of maternity care have completed an accredited education program, passed a board certification examination with a mechanism for certification maintenance, and are legally licensed to practice within their jurisdiction. Professional cooperation is a system priority. There is innovation to formalize the inclusion and effective functioning of more multidisciplinary team roles. The rules and systems of care are rewritten to make room for the advent of a variety of complementary coaches, advisors, and experts, who may be involved according to their scope of practice and as desired by each woman and indicated by her individual health needs and those of her fetus.
For Care Around the Time of Birth, each woman is able to assemble the team of caregivers that best meets her needs for ample support and safe, effective care with least risk for harm during labor, birth, and the immediate postpartum period. The goal of the birth care team is to optimize her health outcomes and care experience during this critical time and to protect, promote and support her innate ability to give birth while providing for her individual health needs and those of her fetus.
Care After Giving Birth is envisioned as a team endeavor orchestrated around, and directed by, the needs of each woman to provide optimal care for her, for her baby, and for her family. During this vulnerable developmental period, each woman's care is coordinated by a primary caregiver with postpartum care competencies.
Care Settings
For all maternity care phases, safe, effective care is available to women in the locations that are most convenient and accessible to them, given consideration for value and efficiency. The environment of care in all settings is designed to be woman-centered and to facilitate the realization of goals for care during this phase. Specific elements of design that may contribute to achieving these goals are considered.
An array of community, ambulatory and hospital-based choices for Care During Pregnancy optimizes the possibilities for each woman to take advantage of this time of great opportunity to make improvements in her life and overall health, and to prepare for giving birth and parenting.
For Care Around the Time of Birth, a full range of safe birth settings is available and receives system-wide support, so that each woman is free to choose the setting that is most appropriate for her level of need and that of her fetus/baby and that best reflects her values, culture, and preferences. This choice can be made with confidence because each setting assures her a consistent standard of safe, effective, risk-appropriate care, within an integrated system that provides for coordinated consultation, collaboration, or transfer in either direction should her level of need or that of her baby change.
An expanded choice of settings for Care After Giving Birth continues the possibilities for each woman to make effective use of this time of opportunity for improving her life and overall health, and that of her family. To that end, care after birth is community-based, situated within the social context of the woman, and founded on a holistic model that prioritizes wellness and preventive services.
Care Levels C and D: Health Care Organizations and the Macro Environment
Applying Berwick's framework of four levels of care to the maternity care system, this section addresses key goals and principles for Levels C and D: the hospitals and health care organizations that house and support clinical microsystems, and the greater environment of health care policy, payment, regulation, accreditation, litigation, and other macro-level factors that influence the delivery of maternity care. This section describes a vision for the key attributes and characteristics at the macro levels of a high-quality, high-value maternity care system that can best support the goals put forward for the care experiences of women and babies receiving maternity care and the microsystems that directly provide such care.
Level C: Health Care Organizations
This section outlines the goals for the system features and roles of health care organizations providing maternity services within a high-quality, high-value maternity care system.
To strengthen the structure of the maternity care delivery systemLevel D: Macro Environment of Care
This section outlines the goals for the system features and roles of the environment of policy, payment, regulation, accreditation, litigation, and other macro-level factors that influence the delivery of care within a high-quality, high-value maternity care system.
To strengthen performance measurementFinally, “the long clear sightline of this framework for possibility” (Zander & Zander, 2000) radiates forward to culminate in the following ultimate vision:
The “2020 Vision for a High-Quality, High-Value Maternity Care System” has been actualized through concerted multi-stakeholder efforts ensuring that all women and babies are served by a maternity care system that delivers safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable, woman- and family-centered maternity care. The U.S. ranks at the top among industrialized nations in key maternal and infant health indicators and has achieved global recognition for its transformative leadership.
References
- Where is the “w”oman in MCH? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;199(6 Suppl. 2):s259–265
- . A user's manual for the IOM's ‘Quality Chasm’ report. Health Affairs. 2002;21:80–90
- Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Medical Education. 2005;5:1
- . Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001;
- . The future of preconception care: A clinical perspective. Women's Health Issues. 2008;8:s19–25
- . Evidence-based maternity care: What it is and what it can achieve. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund; 2008;Available at: http://www.milbankmemorialfund.org/reporderframe.html
- . Routine pre-pregnancy health promotion for improving pregnancy outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;Issue 4. Art. No.: CD007536 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007536.pub2
- . The art of possibility: Transforming professional and personal life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2000;
- A compendium of systematic reviews and better quality evidence of the effectiveness of core elements of systems in maternity care used as a resource bibliography by the Vision Team is available at: www.childbirthconnection.org/vision.
Martha Cook Carter, CNM, MBA, is Chief Executive Officer of the FamilyCare Health Center, WomenCare, Inc.
Maureen P. Corry, MPH, is Executive Director of Childbirth Connection.
Suzanne F. Delbanco, PhD, is President of the Health Care Division of Arrowsight, Inc.
Tina Clark-Samazan Foster, MD, MPH, MS, is an Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Community and Family Medicine at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
Robert Friedland, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Health Systems Administration at Georgetown University.
Robyn Gabel, MSPH, is Executive Directive of the Illinois Maternal Child Health Coalition.
Teresa Gipson, RN, MD, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University.
Rima Jolivet, CNM, MSN, MPH, is Associate Director of Programs at Childbirth Connection, and Director of the Transforming Maternity Care Symposium.
Elliott Main, MD, is Chair of the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Director of Obstetric Quality at Sutter Health, and Chief of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the California Pacific Medical Center.
Carol Sakala, PhD, MSPH, is Director of Programs at Childbirth Connection.
Penny Simkin, PT, CD, is an Author, Doula, Childbirth Educator, and Birth Counselor, and is a member of the Faculty of the Simkin School at the Bastyr University Department of Midwifery, formerly the Seattle Midwifery School.
Kathleen Rice Simpson, PhD, RNC, FAAN, is a Perinatal Clinical Nurse Specialist at St. John's Mercy Medical Center.
PII: S1049-3867(09)00139-X
doi:10.1016/j.whi.2009.11.006
© 2010 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
